LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,262
تعداد مقالات11,503
تعداد مشاهده مقاله81,855,803
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله120,988,738
Madadizadeh, Farzan, Bahariniya, Sajjad. (1405). Practical and Implementation Challenges of Three Selected Psychometric Indices. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, (), -. doi: 10.30476/ijms.2025.107691.4222
Farzan Madadizadeh; Sajjad Bahariniya. "Practical and Implementation Challenges of Three Selected Psychometric Indices". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, , , 1405, -. doi: 10.30476/ijms.2025.107691.4222
Madadizadeh, Farzan, Bahariniya, Sajjad. (1405). 'Practical and Implementation Challenges of Three Selected Psychometric Indices', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, (), pp. -. doi: 10.30476/ijms.2025.107691.4222
Madadizadeh, Farzan, Bahariniya, Sajjad. Practical and Implementation Challenges of Three Selected Psychometric Indices. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1405; (): -. doi: 10.30476/ijms.2025.107691.4222

Practical and Implementation Challenges of Three Selected Psychometric Indices

Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences
مقالات آماده انتشار، اصلاح شده برای چاپ، انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 11 فروردین 1405    اصل مقاله (403.76 K)
نوع مقاله: Letter(s) to the Editor
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/ijms.2025.107691.4222
نویسندگان
Farzan Madadizadeh1، 2؛ Sajjad Bahariniya* 3
1Medical Informatics Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
2Center for Healthcare Data Modeling, Departments of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
3Department of Healthcare Services Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
چکیده
In psychometric analysis, the concepts of reliability and validity are fundamental for assessing the quality of measurement instruments. 

تازه های تحقیق

Farzan Madadizadeh (Google Scholar)
Sajjad Bahariniya (Google Scholar) 

کلیدواژه‌ها
Psychometrics؛ Statistics؛ Biostatistics
مراجع
  1. Watson D, O’Hara MW, Chmielewski M, McDade-Montez EA, Koffel E, Naragon K, et al. Further validation of the IDAS: evidence of convergent, discriminant, criterion, and incremental validity. Psychol Assess. 2008;20:248-59. doi: 10.1037/a0012570. PubMed PMID: 18778161.
  2. Ledger S, Bin YS, Nour M, Cistulli P, Bauman A, Allman-Farinelli M, et al. Internal consistency and convergent and divergent validity of the Liverpool jetlag questionnaire. Chronobiol Int. 2020;37:218-26. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2019.1704771. PubMed PMID: 31934814.
  3. Ronkko M, Cho E. An updated guideline for assessing discriminant validity. Organizational research methods. 2022;25:6-14. doi: 10.1177/1094428120968614.
  4. Colwell SR. The composite reliability calculator User’s guide. Technical Report. 2016.
  5. Bardak F, Mamatoğlu N. Çalışanlar İçin İçsel Motivasyon Ölçeği: Geçerlilik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Humanistic Perspective. 2023;5:1072-97. doi: 10.47793/hp.1264714.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 10
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 11


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب