LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,262
تعداد مقالات11,502
تعداد مشاهده مقاله81,854,373
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله120,988,035
Khosravi, Azam, Latifi, Seied Amirhossein, Van Hee, Robrecht, Amini, Saeed, Changizi-Ashtiyani, Saeed. (1404). A Comparative Analysis of Bloodletting Tools: Mokhdea and Mil Nahan in Medical Books of the Islamic Golden Age (8-13 Century). سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 15(1), 19-26. doi: 10.30476/rhm.2025.104826.1258
Azam Khosravi; Seied Amirhossein Latifi; Robrecht Van Hee; Saeed Amini; Saeed Changizi-Ashtiyani. "A Comparative Analysis of Bloodletting Tools: Mokhdea and Mil Nahan in Medical Books of the Islamic Golden Age (8-13 Century)". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 15, 1, 1404, 19-26. doi: 10.30476/rhm.2025.104826.1258
Khosravi, Azam, Latifi, Seied Amirhossein, Van Hee, Robrecht, Amini, Saeed, Changizi-Ashtiyani, Saeed. (1404). 'A Comparative Analysis of Bloodletting Tools: Mokhdea and Mil Nahan in Medical Books of the Islamic Golden Age (8-13 Century)', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 15(1), pp. 19-26. doi: 10.30476/rhm.2025.104826.1258
Khosravi, Azam, Latifi, Seied Amirhossein, Van Hee, Robrecht, Amini, Saeed, Changizi-Ashtiyani, Saeed. A Comparative Analysis of Bloodletting Tools: Mokhdea and Mil Nahan in Medical Books of the Islamic Golden Age (8-13 Century). سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1404; 15(1): 19-26. doi: 10.30476/rhm.2025.104826.1258

A Comparative Analysis of Bloodletting Tools: Mokhdea and Mil Nahan in Medical Books of the Islamic Golden Age (8-13 Century)

Journal of Research on History of Medicine
دوره 15، شماره 1، اردیبهشت 2026، صفحه 19-26    اصل مقاله (1.2 M)
نوع مقاله: Original Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/rhm.2025.104826.1258
نویسندگان
Azam Khosravi1؛ Seied Amirhossein Latifi2؛ Robrecht Van Hee3؛ Saeed Amini4؛ Saeed Changizi-Ashtiyani* 5
1Instructor of history of medical sciences, Traditional and Complementary Medicine Research Center (TCMRC), Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran
2Associate Professor of Traditional Medicine, Traditional and Complementary Medicine Research Center (TCMRC), Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran
3Professor of surgery, University of Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium
4Associate Professor of Health Services Management, Department of Health Services Management, Khomein University of Medical Sciences, Khomein, Iran
5Professor, Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
چکیده
Understanding surgical instruments throughout history is a fundamental aspect of studying the history of medical science. Gaining insight into the physical characteristics and practical applications of these tools, as well as re-evaluating their designs, can lead to the development of innovative instruments that align with modern technology. This analytical-comparative research employs a comprehensive library-based approach. Hence, it examines various historical documents to compare the concepts of Mokhdea and Mil Nahan, analyzing the use of these similar tools during the significant Islamic period. The findings indicate that there have been numerous instruments that, despite having different names, have served identical purposes throughout the extensive history of surgery. This understanding not only enhances our grasp of surgical history but can also foster improvements and innovations in the design of modern surgical tools. Therefore, exploring these ancient instruments can help us better comprehend the evolution of surgery and its profound impact on contemporary treatment methods, creating a vital bridge between the past and present in medicine.

تازه های تحقیق

Azam Khosravi (Google Scholar)

Saeed Changizi-Ashtiyani (Google Scholar)

کلیدواژه‌ها
Mokhdea؛ Mil Nahan؛ Persian Medicine؛ History؛ Surgery؛ Albucasis
مراجع
  1. Abdel-Halim, R.E., Altwaijiri, A.S., Elfaqih, S.R., and Mitwalli, A.H., 2003. Extraction of urinary bladder stone as described by Abul-Qasim Khalaf Ibn Abbas Alzahrawi (Albucasis) (325-404 H, 930-1013 AD): A translation of original text and a commentary. Saudi Medical Journal, 24, pp. 1283-1291. PMID: 14710270.
  2. Ahmadi, S.A., Zargaran, A., Mehdizadeh, A., and Mortazavi, M.J., 2013. Remanufacturing and evaluation of Al Zahrawi’s surgical instruments, Al Mokhdea as scalpel handle. Galen Medical Journal, 2, pp. 22-25. doi: https://doi.org/10.31661/gmj.v2i1.42.
  3. Albucasis, n.d. Al-Tasrif Leman Ajeza an Al-Talif. [Manuscript]. Held at: Haris: Toras.
  4. Asaad, M., Rajesh, A., Zazo, A., Banuelos, J. and Kaadan, A., 2019. Albucasis: A pioneer plastic surgeon. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 83, pp. 611-617. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002023.
  5. Avicenna, 2009. Al-Qanun fi’l-tibb. In: Ja`far, H. (ed.), Al-Hilal. Beirut: Dar-ol-Behar.
  6. Azam Khan, H.M., 1869. Exir Azam (Great Elixir). Lucknow, India: Monshi Nou. (Original work published 1810).
  7. Changizi Ashtiyani, S., and Cyrus, A., 2010. Rhazes, a genius physician in diagnosis and treatment of kidney calculi in medical history. Iranian Journal of Kidney Diseases, 4, pp. 106-110. PMID: 20404418.
  8. Changizi Ashtiyani, S., Shamsi, M., and Cyrus, A., 2013. Rhazes, a genius physician in the diagnosis and treatment of nocturnal enuresis in medical history. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal, 15, pp. 633-638. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.5017.
  9. Cikmaz, S., and Mesut, R., 2020. History of Islamic medical schools in Turkey’s territory. Balkan Medical Journal, 37, pp. 361-370. doi: 10.4274/balkanmedj.galenos.2020.2020.4.160.
  10. Frey, K., 2014. Surgical technology for the surgical technologist: a positive care approach. Clifton Park, NY: StCHephen Helba.
  11. Harawi, M.Y., 1963. Bahr al-Jawahir Mujamān Mukhtalifān lil-Ṭabīb (Sea of Jewels: A Diverse Dictionary for the Physician). Bayrūt: Dār al-Mashriq.
  12. Iskandar, A.Z., 1972. A study of Al-Samarqandī’s medical writings with special emphasis on his book Al-Asbāb wa Al-’alāmāt (Causes and Symptoms), and Al-Kirmānī’s Sharh Al-Asbāb wa Al-’alāmāt (Commentary on Causes and Symptoms). Le Muséon, 3, pp. 451-479. PMID: 19588583.
  13. Keskinbora, H.K., and Ince, F., 2021. Are There Similarities Between the Works of Abū al-Qāsim al-Zahrāvī and Serefeddin Sabuncuoglu?. The 2nd International Prof. Dr. Fuat Sezgin Symposium on History of Science in Islam Proceedings Book, pp. 283-296 doi: https://doi.org/10.26650/PB/10.26650/PB/AA08.2023.002.022
  14. Khosravi, A., Van Hee, R., Changizi-Ashtiyani, S., and Amini, S., 2021. Abu Al Qasim Al Zahrawi (Albucasis) and types of his used surgical knives. Acta Chirurgica Belgica, 121, pp. 286-294. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2021.1884404.
  15. Kirkup, J., 1983. The history and evolution of surgical instruments. III. Handles. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 65, pp. 269-273. PMID: 6347016.
  16. Mariotti, S., Jannini, E.A. and Martino, E., 2022. Hermaphroditism operation in the Charafed-Din’s manuscript (1465). Journal of Endocrinological Investigation, 45, pp. 469-470.
  17. Panici, P.B., Ruscito, I., Gasparri, M.L., Maffucci, D., Marchese, C., and Bellati, F., 2011. Vaginal reconstruction with the Abbè-McIndoe technique: from dermal grafts to autologous in vitro cultured vaginal tissue transplant. Seminars in Reproductive Medicine, 29, pp. 45-54. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1268703.
  18. Pekesen, M., 2021. Abu Al Qasim Al Zahrawi (Albucasis): The father of modern surgery. Health Sciences Quarterly, 1(2), pp. 83-86. https://doi.org/10.26900/hsq.1.2.05.
  19. Sabuncuoğlu, Ş., n.d. Cerrahiyyetü’l-Haniyye. [Manuscript]. No. T 5965. Held at: Istanbul University Rare Works Library, Istanbul, Turkey.
  20. Shamsi, M., Haghverdi, F. and Changizi Ashtiyani, S., 2014. A brief review of Rhazes, Avicenna, and Jorjani’s views on diagnosis of diseases through urine examination. Iranian Journal of Kidney Diseases, 8, pp. 278-285. PMID: 25001133.
  21. Tarkowski, R., 2019. Cancer education in surgery. Journal of Cancer Education, 34, pp. 837-838. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-019-01615-1.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 11
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 13


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب