LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,255
تعداد مقالات11,434
تعداد مشاهده مقاله81,791,761
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله120,945,606
Dokhaei, Fatemeh, Shadmehr, Azadeh, Malmir, Kazem, Fereydounnia, Sara. (1404). Immediate Effects of Mulligan’s Mobilization with and without Kinesio Taping on Pain, Range of Motion, and Cervical Proprioception in Patients with Chronic Neck Pain: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 13(1), 58-67. doi: 10.30476/jrsr.2025.104687.1532
Fatemeh Dokhaei; Azadeh Shadmehr; Kazem Malmir; Sara Fereydounnia. "Immediate Effects of Mulligan’s Mobilization with and without Kinesio Taping on Pain, Range of Motion, and Cervical Proprioception in Patients with Chronic Neck Pain: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 13, 1, 1404, 58-67. doi: 10.30476/jrsr.2025.104687.1532
Dokhaei, Fatemeh, Shadmehr, Azadeh, Malmir, Kazem, Fereydounnia, Sara. (1404). 'Immediate Effects of Mulligan’s Mobilization with and without Kinesio Taping on Pain, Range of Motion, and Cervical Proprioception in Patients with Chronic Neck Pain: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 13(1), pp. 58-67. doi: 10.30476/jrsr.2025.104687.1532
Dokhaei, Fatemeh, Shadmehr, Azadeh, Malmir, Kazem, Fereydounnia, Sara. Immediate Effects of Mulligan’s Mobilization with and without Kinesio Taping on Pain, Range of Motion, and Cervical Proprioception in Patients with Chronic Neck Pain: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1404; 13(1): 58-67. doi: 10.30476/jrsr.2025.104687.1532

Immediate Effects of Mulligan’s Mobilization with and without Kinesio Taping on Pain, Range of Motion, and Cervical Proprioception in Patients with Chronic Neck Pain: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Journal of Rehabilitation Sciences & Research
دوره 13، شماره 1، خرداد 2026، صفحه 58-67    اصل مقاله (1.5 M)
نوع مقاله: Original Articles
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/jrsr.2025.104687.1532
نویسندگان
Fatemeh Dokhaei1؛ Azadeh Shadmehr* 2؛ Kazem Malmir2؛ Sara Fereydounnia3
1Physical Therapy Department, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
2Professor, Physical Therapy Department, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
3Assistant Professor, Physical Therapy Department, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده
Background: Neck pain is a common musculoskeletal disorder frequently associated with proprioceptive impairments and reduced cervical mobility. This study aimed to evaluate the immediate effects of Mulligan’s mobilization and conventional physiotherapy, with and without Kinesio taping, on pain intensity, cervical range of motion (RoM), and proprioception in individuals with non-specific chronic neck pain.
Methods: This pilot randomized controlled trial included 24 patients (9 men, 15 women; aged 20–55 years) with non-specific chronic neck pain. Participants were randomly assigned to either an experimental group receiving conventional physiotherapy, Mulligan’s mobilization, and Kinesio taping, or a control group receiving conventional physiotherapy and Mulligan’s mobilization alone. Pain intensity, active cervical RoM, and proprioception were assessed pre- and immediately post-intervention. Paired t-tests or Wilcoxon tests were used for within-group comparisons, and independent t-tests or Mann–Whitney tests for between-group comparisons.
Results: Both groups demonstrated significant post-treatment reductions in pain intensity (control: p = 0.10; experimental: p < 0.001). The experimental group showed significant increases in RoM for cervical flexion and left lateral flexion, whereas the control group improved in extension and right lateral flexion (p < 0.05). Regarding proprioception, the experimental group exhibited significant improvement in repositioning accuracy from left rotation to neutral (p = 0.02) and to the target position (p = 0.03). No other proprioceptive measures changed significantly in either group (p > 0.05).
Conclusion: The addition of Mulligan’s mobilization to conventional physiotherapy reduced pain and improved cervical RoM, with greater benefits observed when combined with Kinesio taping. The combined intervention also resulted in superior improvements in cervical proprioception compared with Mulligan’s mobilization alone.

تازه های تحقیق
کلیدواژه‌ها
Kinesio Taping؛ Mulligan Mobilization؛ Neck Pain؛ Chronic Pain؛ Proprioception
مراجع
  1. Mokdad AH, Forouzanfar MH, Daoud F, Mokdad AA, El Bcheraoui C, Moradi-Lakeh M, et al. Danger ahead: the burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors in the Eastern Mediterranean Region, 1990–2015. Int J Public Health. 2018;63:11-23.
  2. Blanpied PR, Gross AR, Elliott JM, Devaney LL, Clewley D, Walton DM, et al. Neck pain: revision 2017: clinical practice guidelines linked to the international classification of functioning, disability and health from the orthopaedic section of the American Physical Therapy Association. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017;47(7):A1-A83.
  3. Goode AP, Freburger J, Carey T. Prevalence, practice patterns, and evidence for chronic neck pain. Arthritis Care Res. 2010;62(11):1594-601.
  4. Nederhand MJ, IJzerman MJ, Hermens HJ, Turk DC, Zilvold G. Predictive value of fear avoidance in developing chronic neck pain disability: consequences for clinical decision making. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(3):496-501.
  5. Kahlaee AH, Ghamkhar L, Nourbakhsh MR, Arab AM. Strength and range of motion in the contralateral side to pain and pain-free regions in unilateral chronic nonspecific neck pain patients. Am J Phys Med 2020;99(2):133-41.
  6. Peng B, Yang L, Li Y, Liu T, Liu Y. Cervical proprioception impairment in neck pain-pathophysiology, clinical evaluation, and management: a narrative review. Pain Ther. 2021;10:143-64.
  7. Hillier S, Immink M, Thewlis D. Assessing proprioception: a systematic review of possibilities. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015;29(10):933-49.
  8. Riemann BL, Lephart SM. The sensorimotor system, part II: the role of proprioception in motor control and functional joint stability. J Athl Train. 2002;37(1):80.
  9. Munn J, Sullivan SJ, Schneiders AG. Evidence of sensorimotor deficits in functional ankle instability: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Sci Med Sport. 2010;13(1):2-12.
  10. Hurley MV, Scott DL, Rees J, Newham DJ. Sensorimotor changes and functional performance in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1997;56(11):641-8.
  11. Fyhr C, Gustavsson L, Wassinger C, Sole G. The effects of shoulder injury on kinaesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Man Ther. 2015;20(1):28-37.
  12. Mazaheri M, Abichandani D, Kingma I, Treleaven J, Falla D. A meta-analysis and systematic review of changes in joint position sense and static standing balance in patients with whiplash-associated disorder. PLoS One. 2021;16(4):e0249659.
  13. Tong MH, Mousavi SJ, Kiers H, Ferreira P, Refshauge K, van Dieën J. Is there a relationship between lumbar proprioception and low back pain? A systematic review with meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med 2017;98(1):120-36.
  14. Proske U, Schaible H-G, Schmidt R. Joint receptors and kinaesthesia. Exp Brain Res. 1988;72(2):219-24.
  15. de Zoete RM, Osmotherly PG, Rivett DA, Farrell SF, Snodgrass SJ. Sensorimotor control in individuals with idiopathic neck pain and healthy individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(6):1257-71.
  16. de Vries J, Ischebeck B, Voogt L, Van Der Geest J, Janssen M, Frens M, et al. Joint position sense error in people with neck pain: a systematic review. Man Ther. 2015;20(6):736-44.
  17. Verhagen AP. Physiotherapy management of neck pain. J Physiother. 2021;67(1):5-11.
  18. Coulter ID, Crawford C, Vernon H, Hurwitz EL, Khorsan R, Booth MS, et al. Manipulation and mobilization for treating chronic nonspecific neck pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis for an appropriateness panel. Pain physician. 2019;22(2):E55.
  19. Fernández-de-las-Peñas C, Alonso-Blanco H, Palacios-Ceña FJ, Garrido-Marín DM, Cleland JA, Fuensalida-Novo S. The effectiveness of manual therapy for neck pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Musculoskeletal Sci Pract. 2018;33:58-67.
  20. Mulligan BR. Manual Therapy:" NAGs"," SNAGs"," MWMs" etc. 6th ed. Orthopedic Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation ; 2004.
  21. Shereen AA, Eid MA, Elsoudany AM, Mostafa W, Alshehri MA, Alshahrani F. The immediate effects of Mulligan mobilization with movement technique in patients with neck pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2017;21(4):950-8.
  22. Falla DL, Jull GA, Hodges PW. Patients with neck pain demonstrate reduced electromyographic activity of the deep cervical flexor muscles during performance of the craniocervical flexion test. Spine. 2004;29(19):2108-14.
  23. Alahmari KA, Reddy RS, Tedla JS, Samuel PS, Kakaraparthi VN, Rengaramanujam K, et al. The effect of Kinesio taping on cervical proprioception in athletes with mechanical neck pain—a placebo-controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21(1):1-9.
  24. Erdoğanoğlu Y, Bayraklı B. Short-term changes in chronic neck pain after the use of elastic adhesive tape. J Chiropr Med. 2021;20(2):70-6.
  25. Revel M, Andre-Deshays C, Minguet M. Cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility in patients with cervical pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1991;72(5):288-91.
  26. Roren A, Mayoux-Benhamou M-A, Fayad F, Poiraudeau S, Lantz D, Revel M. Comparison of visual and ultrasound based techniques to measure head repositioning in healthy and neck-pain subjects. Man Ther. 2009;14(3):270-7.
  27. Hill R, Jensen P, Baardsen T, Kulvik K, Jull G, Treleaven J. Head repositioning accuracy to neutral: a comparative study of error calculation. Man Ther. 2009;14(1):110-4.
  28. Pinsault N, Vuillerme N, Pavan P. Cervicocephalic relocation test to the neutral head position: assessment in bilateral labyrinthine-defective and chronic, nontraumatic neck pain patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(12):2375-8.
  29. Bodian CA, Freedman G, Hossain S, Eisenkraft JB, Beilin Y. The visual analog scale for pain: clinical significance in postoperative patients. Anesthesiology. 2001;95(6):1356-61.
  30. Carlsson AM. Assessment of chronic pain. I. Aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale. Pain. 1983;16(1):87-101.
  31. Bijur PE, Silver W, Gallagher EJ. Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain. Acad Emerg Med. 2001;8(12):1153-7.
  32. Piva SR, Erhard RE, Childs JD, Browder DA. Inter-tester reliability of passive intervertebral and active movements of the cervical spine. Man Ther. 2006;11(4):321-30.
  33. de Koning CH, van den Heuvel SP, Staal JB, Smits-Engelsman BC, Hendriks EJ. Clinimetric evaluation of active range of motion measures in patients with non-specific neck pain: a systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2008;17:905-21.
  34. Buyukturan O, Buyukturan B, Sas S, Karartı C, Ceylan I. The effect of mulligan mobilization technique in older adults with neck pain: A randomized controlled, double-blind study. Pain Res Manag. 2018;2018.
  35. Bedwell C, Dowswell T, Neilson JP, Lavender T. The use of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for pain relief in labour: a review of the evidence. Midwifery. 2011;27(5):e141-e8.
  36. van der Windt DA, van der Heijden GJ, van den Berg SG, Ter Riet G, de Winter AF, Bouter LM. Ultrasound therapy for musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review. Pain. 1999;81(3):257-71.
  37. Zronek M, Sanker H, Newcomb J, Donaldson M. The influence of home exercise programs for patients with non-specific or specific neck pain: a systematic review of the literature. J Man Manip Ther. 2016;24(2):62-73.
  38. Saavedra-Hernández M, Castro-Sánchez AM, Arroyo-Morales M, Cleland JA, Lara-Palomo IC, Fernandez-De-Las-Penas C. Short-term effects of kinesio taping versus cervical thrust manipulation in patients with mechanical neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42(8):724-30.
  39. Artioli DP, Bertolini GRF. Kinesio taping: application and results on pain: systematic review. Fisioter 2014;21:94-9.
  40. Schmid A, Brunner F, Wright A, Bachmann LM. Paradigm shift in manual therapy? Evidence for a central nervous system component in the response to passive cervical joint mobilisation. Man Ther. 2008;13(5):387-96.
  41. Zemadanis K. The short and mid-term effects of Mulligan concept in patients with chronic mechanical neck pain. J Novel Physiother Rehabil. 2018;2:022-35.
  42. Buyukturan O, Buyukturan B, Sas S, Karartı C, Ceylan I. The Effect of Mulligan Mobilization Technique in Older Adults with Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled, Double‐Blind Study. Pain Res Manag. 2018;2018(1):2856375.
  43. Vicenzino B, Paungmali A, Teys P. Mulligan's mobilization-with-movement, positional faults and pain relief: current concepts from a critical review of literature. Man Ther. 2007;12(2):98-108.
  44. Harsulkar SG, Khatri SM, Rao K, Iyer C. Effectiveness of gong’s mobilization in cervical spondylosis: A prospective comparative study. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2015;2(1):38-44.
  45. Copurgensli C, Gur G, Tunay VB. A comparison of the effects of Mulligan's mobilization and Kinesio taping on pain, range of motion, muscle strength, and neck disability in patients with cervical spondylosis: A randomized controlled study. J Back Musculoskeletal Rehabil. 2017;30(1):51-62.
  46. Bush KW, Collins N, Portman L, Tillett N. Validity and intertester reliability of cervical range of motion using inclinometer measurements. J Man Manip Ther. 2000;8(2):52-61.
  47. Gong W. Effects of cervical joint manipulation on joint position sense of normal adults. J Phys Ther Sci. 2013;25(6):721-3.
 

 

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 8
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 5


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب