LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,255
تعداد مقالات11,434
تعداد مشاهده مقاله81,791,761
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله120,945,606
Ahmed, Faruq, Hassan, Nazmul, Sabrin, Saiba, Hasan, Mohammad, Akter, Shajida, Moula, Golam, Priti, Moeidu, Faruki, Maruful. (1404). Life Satisfaction and Socioeconomic Situation among Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury in Community Settings in Bangladesh. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 13(1), 51-57. doi: 10.30476/jrsr.2024.104534.1528
Faruq Ahmed; Nazmul Hassan; Saiba Muhammad Sabrin; Mohammad Nazmul Hasan; Shajida Akter; Golam Moula; Moeidu Bhuian Priti; Maruful Hasan Faruki. "Life Satisfaction and Socioeconomic Situation among Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury in Community Settings in Bangladesh". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 13, 1, 1404, 51-57. doi: 10.30476/jrsr.2024.104534.1528
Ahmed, Faruq, Hassan, Nazmul, Sabrin, Saiba, Hasan, Mohammad, Akter, Shajida, Moula, Golam, Priti, Moeidu, Faruki, Maruful. (1404). 'Life Satisfaction and Socioeconomic Situation among Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury in Community Settings in Bangladesh', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 13(1), pp. 51-57. doi: 10.30476/jrsr.2024.104534.1528
Ahmed, Faruq, Hassan, Nazmul, Sabrin, Saiba, Hasan, Mohammad, Akter, Shajida, Moula, Golam, Priti, Moeidu, Faruki, Maruful. Life Satisfaction and Socioeconomic Situation among Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury in Community Settings in Bangladesh. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1404; 13(1): 51-57. doi: 10.30476/jrsr.2024.104534.1528

Life Satisfaction and Socioeconomic Situation among Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury in Community Settings in Bangladesh

Journal of Rehabilitation Sciences & Research
دوره 13، شماره 1، خرداد 2026، صفحه 51-57    اصل مقاله (1.14 M)
نوع مقاله: Original Articles
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/jrsr.2024.104534.1528
نویسندگان
Faruq Ahmed* 1؛ Nazmul Hassan2؛ Saiba Muhammad Sabrin3؛ Mohammad Nazmul Hasan1؛ Shajida Akter4؛ Golam Moula5؛ Moeidu Bhuian Priti1؛ Maruful Hasan Faruki1
1Department of Physiotherapy, Centre for the Rehabilitation of the Paralysed (CRP), Savar, Dhaka-1343, Bangladesh.
2Department of Rehabilitation Science, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL-35233, USA.
3Department of Physiotherapy, Bangladesh Health Professions Institute (BHPI), Savar, Dhaka-1343, Bangladesh.
4Department of Basic Science and Literature, Bangladesh Health Professions Institute (BHPI), Savar, Dhaka-1343, Bangladesh.
5Department of Physiotherapy, Dhaka College of Physiotherapy, Adabor, Dhaka-1207, Bangladesh.
چکیده
Background: Individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) often face numerous challenges in their communities after completing rehabilitation. This study aimed to examine the socioeconomic status and level of life satisfaction among individuals with SCI living in community settings in Bangladesh.
Methods: A cross-sectional telephone survey was conducted among 150 individuals with SCI who had completed rehabilitation at a specialized center. Participants were recruited from all eight divisional regions of Bangladesh. Life satisfaction and socioeconomic status were assessed using the Life Satisfaction Questionnaire-11 (LISAT-11) and the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0), respectively. Spearman’s correlation and multivariate linear regression analyses were performed to explore associations between variables.
Results: Among the participants, 84% had traumatic SCI, and 90% were male. Paraplegia was present in 64.7%, and 74% resided in rural areas. Approximately 46.7% reported a modest monthly income. The majority experienced moderate disability (43.68%) and reported life satisfaction (30.67%). Higher disability levels were strongly associated with lower life satisfaction (r = -0.852, p < 0.001). Life satisfaction was also significantly correlated with monthly income and injury severity.
Conclusion: Individuals with SCI in Bangladesh face substantial reductions in life satisfaction, economic hardship, and challenges in community participation after returning to the community.

تازه های تحقیق
کلیدواژه‌ها
Spinal Cord Injury؛ Life Satisfaction؛ Community Participation؛ Socioeconomic Situation؛ Bangladesh
مراجع
  1. Ahmed N, Quadir MM, Rahman MA, Alamgir H. Community integration and life satisfaction among individuals with spinal cord injury living in the community after receiving institutional care in Bangladesh. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(9):1033-40.
  2. Burns AS, O’Connell C. The challenge of spinal cord injury care in the developing world. J Spinal Cord Med. 2012;35:3-8.
  3. Moghimian M, Kashani F, Cheraghi MA, Mohammadnejad E. Quality of life and related factors among people with spinal cord injuries in Tehran, Iran. Arch Trauma Res. 2015;4(3).
  4. Saadat S, Javadi M, Divshali BS, Tavakoli AH, Ghodsi SM, Montazeri A, et al. Health-related quality of life among individuals with long-standing spinal cord injury: a comparative study of veterans and non-veterans. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:1-7.
  5. Burleigh SA, Farber RS, Gillard M. Community Integration and life satisfaction after traumatic brain injury: long-term findings. Am J Occup Ther. 1998;52:45-52.
  6. Rahimi-Movaghar V, Sayyah MK, Akbari H, Khorramirouz R, Rasouli MR, Moradi-Lakeh M, et al. Epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury in developing countries: a systematic review. Neuroepidemiology. 2013;41:65-85.
  7. Ullah MM, Sarker A, Chowdhury SK. Assessment for returning to work after spinal cord injuries and patient's vocational preferences. Work. 2015;50(3):387-93.
  8. Islam MS, Hafez MA, Akter M. Characterization of spinal cord lesion in patients attending a specialized rehabilitation center in Bangladesh. Spinal Cord. 2011;49(7):783-6.
  9. Lee BB, Cripps RA, Fitzharris M, Wing PC. The global map for traumatic spinal cord injury epidemiology: update 2011, global incidence rate. Spinal Cord. 2014;52(2):110-6.
  10. Sekaran P, Vijayakumari F, Hariharan R, Zachariah K, Joseph SE, Senthil Kumar RK. Community reintegration of spinal cord-injured patients in rural south India. Spinal Cord. 2010;48:628-632.
  11. Burleigh SA, Farber RS, Gillard M. Community Integration and life satisfaction after traumatic brain injury: long-term findings. Am J Occup Ther. 1998;52:45–52.
  12. Cox RJ, Amsters DI, Pershouse KJ. The need for a multidisciplinary outreach service for people with spinal cord injuryliving in the community. Clin Rehabil. 2001;15:600-606.
  13. Craig A, Nicholson Perry K, Guest R, Tran Y, Middleton J. Adjustment following chronic spinal cord injury: Determining factors that contribute to social participation. Br J Health Psychol. 2015;20:807-823.
  14. Barclay L, Robins L, Migliorini C, Lalor A. Community integration programs and interventions for people with spinal cord injury: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil. 2021;43(26):3845-55.
  15. Kratz AL, Chadd E, Jensen MP, Kehn M, Kroll T. An examination of the psychometric properties of the community integration questionnaire (CIQ) in spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2015;38:446-455.
  16. Fuhrer MJ. Subjectifying quality of life as a medical rehabilitation outcome. Disabil Rehabil 2000;22(11):481-9.
  17. Post MW, de Witte LP, van Asbeck FW, van Dijk AJ, Schrijvers AJ. Predictors of health status and life satisfaction in spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79(4):395-401.
  18. Burleigh SA, Farber RS, Gillard M. Community integration and life satisfaction after traumatic brain injury: Long-term findings. Am J Occup Ther. 1998;52(1):45-52.
  19. Santino N, Larocca V, Hitzig SL, Guilcher SJ, Craven BC, Bassett-Gunter RL. Physical activity and life satisfaction among individuals with spinal cord injury: Exploring loneliness as a possible mediator. J Spinal Cord Med. 2022;45(2):173-9.
  20. Centre for the Rehabilitation of the Paralysed. Annual Report 14/15.2016:09.
  21. Silveira C, Souza RT, Costa ML, Parpinelli MA, Pacagnella RC, Ferreira EC, et al. Validation of the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) 12‐item tool against the 36‐item version for measuring functioning and disability associated with pregnancy and history of severe maternal morbidity. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2018;141:39-47.
  22. Üstün TB, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Rehm J, Kennedy C, Epping-Jordan J, et al. Developing the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. Bull World Health Organ. 2010;88:815-823.
  23. Ekstrand E, Lexell J, Brogardh C. Test-retest reliability of the Life Satisfaction Questionnaire (LiSat-11) and association between items in individuals with chronic stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2018;50(8):713-8.
  24. Center SL. Facts and figures at a glance. Birmingham, AL: University of Alabama at Birmingham. 2016;10.
  25. Wyndaele M, Wyndaele JJ. Incidence, prevalence and epidemiology of spinal cord injury: what learns a worldwide literature survey? Spinal Cord. 2006;44(9):523-9.
  26. Rahimi-Movaghar V, Sayyah MK, Akbari H, Khorramirouz R, Rasouli MR, Moradi-Lakeh M, et al. Epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury in developing countries: a systematic review. Neuroepidemiology. 2013;41:65–85.
  27. Niu SP, Zhang YJ, Han N, Yin XF, Zhang DY, Kou YH. Identification of four differentially expressed genes associated with acute and chronic spinal cord injury based on bioinformatics data. Neural Regeneration Research. 2021 May 1;16(5):865-70.
  28. Krause JS, Carter RE, Pickelsimer E. Behavioral risk factors of mortality after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(1):95-101.
  29. Post MW, van Leeuwen CM. Psychosocial issues in spinal cord injury: a review. Spinal Cord. 2012;50(5):382-9.
  30. Hossain MS, Harvey LA, Rahman MA, Muldoon S, Bowden JL, Islam MS, et al. Community-based InterVentions to prevent serIous Complications (CIVIC) following spinal cord injury in Bangladesh: protocol of a randomized controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e010350.
  31. World Health Organization. World health statistics 2010. World Health Organization; 2010 May 10.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 8
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 5


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب