LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,243
تعداد مقالات11,323
تعداد مشاهده مقاله81,230,035
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله116,756,925
HU, DANIEL, LOU, MARY, NADELLA, AKASH, NADELLA, MOHNISH, CAPRARO, GEOFF. (1404). Perceptions of Healthcare Design Course Implementation and Opportunities from a Student-Driven Multidisciplinary Collaboration. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 14(1), 32-42. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2025.108162.2239
DANIEL HU; MARY LOU; AKASH NADELLA; MOHNISH NADELLA; GEOFF CAPRARO. "Perceptions of Healthcare Design Course Implementation and Opportunities from a Student-Driven Multidisciplinary Collaboration". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 14, 1, 1404, 32-42. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2025.108162.2239
HU, DANIEL, LOU, MARY, NADELLA, AKASH, NADELLA, MOHNISH, CAPRARO, GEOFF. (1404). 'Perceptions of Healthcare Design Course Implementation and Opportunities from a Student-Driven Multidisciplinary Collaboration', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 14(1), pp. 32-42. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2025.108162.2239
HU, DANIEL, LOU, MARY, NADELLA, AKASH, NADELLA, MOHNISH, CAPRARO, GEOFF. Perceptions of Healthcare Design Course Implementation and Opportunities from a Student-Driven Multidisciplinary Collaboration. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1404; 14(1): 32-42. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2025.108162.2239

Perceptions of Healthcare Design Course Implementation and Opportunities from a Student-Driven Multidisciplinary Collaboration

Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism
دوره 14، شماره 1، فروردین 2026، صفحه 32-42    اصل مقاله (2.02 M)
نوع مقاله: Original Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/jamp.2025.108162.2239
نویسندگان
DANIEL HU* 1؛ MARY LOU1؛ AKASH NADELLA1؛ MOHNISH NADELLA1؛ GEOFF CAPRARO2
1Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Rhode Island, United States
2Department of Emergency Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University Health, Rhode Island, United States
چکیده
Introduction: Design thinking is vital in medical education for addressing complex healthcare challenges, but interdisciplinary collaboration opportunities remain limited. This study evaluates student-reported 1) exposure to design-thinking methods, and 2) access to healthcare-specific design opportunities (courses, projects, mentors, and networks) at Brown University, the Rhode Island School of Design (RISD), and the Warren Alpert Medical School (AMS). It also assesses a student-driven organization that fosters skill development, interdisciplinary collaboration, and project-based learning.
Methods: A survey was developed with multidisciplinary student and faculty review for face and content validity. Using a cross-sectional convenience sample from a cross-institutional listserv, 77 students completed the 25-question survey covering demographics, prior experiences, interests, and perceived access to healthcare design opportunities. Responses used checkbox and Likert scale formats. We used descriptive statistics and between-group comparisons (project participants vs nonparticipants) via t-tests on Likert means (α=0.05).
Results: The survey yielded 77 responses. Respondents represented Brown (61%), AMS (18%), and RISD (14%), with 6% enrolled in joint Brown-RISD programs. Institutional disparities were noted from self-reported aptitudes: RISD students excelled in design (100%), and AMS in research (79%). Brown students reported the greatest access to academic opportunities in healthcare design (68%). Common challenges included limited professional networks (average 2.4/5). Participants sought collaborations and skills from other institutions. Most respondents (94%) desired project-based opportunities, highlighting demand for practical applications. Design x Health project participants reported significantly higher self-perceived access to opportunities and understanding of design processes compared to non-participants.
Conclusions: This study highlights the potential of student-driven organizations in addressing limited opportunities and networking needed to incorporate design in health solutions. By improving access to networks and integrating healthcare design into curricular and extracurricular offerings, such initiatives prepare students to tackle healthcare challenges.

تازه های تحقیق
کلیدواژه‌ها
Interdisciplinary studies؛ Problem solving؛ Innovativeness؛ Curriculum؛ Medical education
مراجع
  1. Sandars J, Goh PS. Design Thinking in Medical Education: The Key Features and Practical Application. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2020;7:2382120520926518.
  2. McLaughlin JE, Wolcott MD, Hubbard D, Umstead K, Rider TR. A qualitative review of the design thinking framework in health professions education. BMC Medical Education. 2019;19(1):98.
  3. Muratovski G. Towards Evidence-Based Research and Cross-Disciplinary Design Practice. In: Darbellay F, Moody Z, Lubart T, editors. Creativity, Design Thinking and Interdisciplinarity. Singapore: Springer Singapore; 2017. pp. 3-15.
  4. Stalmeijer RE, Gijselaers WH, Wolfhagen IHAP, Harendza S, Scherpbier AJJA. How interdisciplinary teams can create multi-disciplinary education: the interplay between team processes and educational quality. Med Educ. 2007;41(11):1059-66.
  5. Matthews J, Wright N. Exploring Clinical Healthcare Challenges and Solutions Through a Design Thinking Education Program for Senior Health Professionals. In: Miller E, Winter A, Chari S, editors. How Designers Are Transforming Healthcare. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore; 2024. pp. 297-313.
  6. Gola M, Brambilla A, Barach P, Signorelli C, Capolongo S. Educational challenges in healthcare design: Training multidisciplinary professionals for future hospitals and healthcare. Annali di Igiene Medicina Preventiva e di Comunità. 2020;32(5):549-66.
  7. Abu-Rish E, Kim S, Choe L, Varpio L, Malik E, White AA, et al. Current trends in interprofessional education of health sciences students: a literature review. J Interprof Care. 2012;26(6):444-51.
  8. Albala L, Bober T, Mallozzi M, Koeneke-Hernandez L, Ku B. Design-thinking, making, and innovating: Fresh tools for the physician's toolbox. Universal Journal of Educational Research. 2018;6(1):179-83.
  9. Sudacka M, Adler M, Durning SJ, Edelbring S, Frankowska A, Hartmann D, et al. Why is it so difficult to implement a longitudinal clinical reasoning curriculum? A multicenter interview study on the barriers perceived by European health professions educators. BMC Medical Education. 2021;21(1):575.
  10. Khanna P, Roberts C, Lane AS. Designing health professional education curricula using systems thinking perspectives. BMC Medical Education. 2021;21(1):20.
  11. van Velzen M, Boru A, Sarton E, de Beaufort AJ. Design thinking in medical education to tackle real world healthcare problems: The MasterMinds Challenge. Med Teach. 2024;46(5):611-3.
  12. van Diggele C, Roberts C, Burgess A, Mellis C. Interprofessional education: tips for design and implementation. BMC Medical Education. 2020;20(2):455.
  13. Sunguya BF, Hinthong W, Jimba M, Yasuoka J. Interprofessional education for whom?—challenges and lessons learned from its implementation in developed countries and their application to developing countries: a systematic review. PloS one. 2014;9(5):e96724.
  14. Ayako Takase RL. Design Framework. IE Universitty: Grad Studio II; 2021.
  15. Tschimmel K, editor. Design Thinking as an effective Toolkit for Innovation. ISPIM Conference Proceedings. The International Society for Professional Innovation Management (ISPIM); Seoul, South Korea; 2012.
  16. Design C. The Double Diamond: A universally accepted depiction of the design process. UK: Design Council; 2005.
  17. Ku B, Lupton E. Health Design Thinking: Creating Products and Services for Better Health. New York: Cooper Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum; 2020.
  18. Lupton E, Ku B. Health Design Thinking. 2nd Edition. New York: Cooper Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum and MIT Press; 2022.
  19. Duke University’s Clinical Research and Innovation Scholarship Year [Internet]. North Carolina, USA; 2025 [Cited 20 June 2025]. Available from: https://medschool.duke.edu/about-us/contact-duke-university-school-medicine.
  20. Deitte LA, Omary RA. The Power of Design Thinking in Medical Education. Academic Radiology. 2019;26(10):1417-20.
  21. van de Grift TC, Kroeze R. Design Thinking as a Tool for Interdisciplinary Education in Health Care. Acad Med. 2016;91(9):1234-8.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 5
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 3


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب