پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 20 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,242 |
| تعداد مقالات | 11,296 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 81,093,964 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 116,690,044 |
Microshear Bond Strength of High-Viscosity Glass Ionomer Cement and Resin Cements: An in vitro Study | ||
| Journal of Dentistry | ||
| مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده، انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 02 دی 1404 اصل مقاله (404.06 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/dentjods.2025.105026.2592 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Zahra Fattah* ؛ Zahra Jowkar؛ Fereshteh Shafiei؛ Zahra Khalafi | ||
| Dept. of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Background: While the advent of self-adhesive resin cements has simplified indirect restoration luting by reducing technique-sensitivity, the clinical longevity of these restorations remains fundamentally dependent on the bond strength achieved by different resin cement types to the restoration material. Purpose: The aim of this study is to investigate the microshear bond strength of three types of resin cements (RCs) to high-viscosity glass ionomer cements (HVGICs). Materials and Method: In an in vitro study, sixty cylindrical specimens were prepared from two HVGICs (EQUIA Forte Fil and Riva). Then, a polyvinyl chloride microtube (with 0.7mm diameter and 0.5mm height) was placed on each sample surface and was filled using various types of RCs, including conventional RC (Dou-Link), self-etch RC (Panavia F2), and self-adhesive RC (TheraCem). The μSBS of the specimens was measured after 24 hrs. and analyzed with two-way ANOVA and Tukey test (p Value< 0.05). Results: According to the result of the two-way ANOVA test, the RCs showed a significa-nt effect on µSBS (p< 0.0001) while no significant effect was observed in HVGIC on the µSBS (p= 0.325). For both HVGICs, there was a significant difference between the µSBS of Panavia F2 and the other types of RCs (p< 0.0001) while no statistically significant diff-erence was found between Dou-Link and TheraCem (p= 0.515). No significant difference was observed between the two HVGICs according to the Tukey test results (p= 0.325). Conclusion: Self-adhesive resin cements showed higher bond strength than other resin cement. Moreover, different types of HVGICs make no difference in the RCs bond strength when used as the core-build-up. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Resin cement؛ Glass Ionomer Cement؛ Shear Strength؛ Dental Bonding؛ Dental Cements | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 3 |
||