پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 20 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 1,211 |
| تعداد مقالات | 11,023 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 74,520,623 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 84,491,026 |
Reproductive Donors’ Needs and Preferences: A Mixed-methods Systematic Review | ||
| International Journal of Community Based Nursing & Midwifery | ||
| مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده، انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 23 مرداد 1404 اصل مقاله (1.14 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Review article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/ijcbnm.2025.104984.2674 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Elnaz Iranifard1، 2؛ Robab Latifnejad Roudsari3، 4؛ Malihe Amirian5؛ Samira Ebrahimzadeh Zagami* 3، 4 | ||
| 1Department of Midwifery, May.C., Islamic Azad University, Maybod, Iran; | ||
| 2Student Research Committee, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran; | ||
| 3Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran; | ||
| 4Department of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran; | ||
| 5Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Background: Reproductive donation is a challenging task, in which donors’ needs are sometimes neglected. To provide reproductive donors with well-structured, evidence-based, and donor-centered care, it is essential to acknowledge their unique needs and preferences. This study aimed to synthesize the current evidence regarding donors’ needs and preferences. Methods: This mixed-methods systematic review (MMSR) was conducted based on the recommended approach for MMSR by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) manual for data synthesis. The databases of Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus were searched by two researchers separately, using keywords such as “egg donor”, “sperm donor”, “ovum donor”, “gamete donor”, “embryo donor”, desire, expectation, preference, and need without a time limit, up to December 2024. Original research articles regarding reproductive donors’ needs, written in English, were included in the study. Reviews, commentaries, letters to the editor, book chapters, and theses were excluded. Quality assessment was carried out by two researchers using JBI tools for cross-sectional, cohort, and qualitative studies. Data were synthesized by the convergent integrated approach by three researchers. Results: Through data synthesis of 34 eligible articles, six categories of reproductive donors’ needs and preferences emerged. These categories included 1) Need for support, 2) Informational needs, 3) Need for counseling, 4) Requirement for financial policies, 5) Preference towards recognition of donors’ rights, and 6) Need for preserving donors’ dignity and respect. Conclusion: Various reproductive donors’ needs and preferences are not completely met by the current care provided by fertility clinics. Healthcare policymakers and fertility clinics must consider the donors’ needs and preferences in policymaking and/or clinical practice to provide the services that donors deserve. Registration: The protocol of this systematic review has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024588821). | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Embryo donation؛ Infertility؛ Ovum donors؛ Semen donors؛ Systematic review | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 3 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 5 |
||