LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,210
تعداد مقالات11,009
تعداد مشاهده مقاله74,297,056
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله65,666,071
Umaroh, Ayu Khoirotul, Rayid Ramdhani, Muhammad, Nindyasari, Jenita Berlian, Kusnul Khotimah, Mabarod, Khoirunnisa, Salma, Mukti Kusumaningtyas, Bethari. (1404). Assessing Teacher Satisfaction with the SistaUKS System: A New Approach to School Health Program Stratification. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 13(3), 283-292. doi: 10.30476/jhsss.2024.103047.1928
Ayu Khoirotul Umaroh; Muhammad Rayid Ramdhani; Jenita Berlian Nindyasari; Mabarod Kusnul Khotimah; Salma Khoirunnisa; Bethari Mukti Kusumaningtyas. "Assessing Teacher Satisfaction with the SistaUKS System: A New Approach to School Health Program Stratification". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 13, 3, 1404, 283-292. doi: 10.30476/jhsss.2024.103047.1928
Umaroh, Ayu Khoirotul, Rayid Ramdhani, Muhammad, Nindyasari, Jenita Berlian, Kusnul Khotimah, Mabarod, Khoirunnisa, Salma, Mukti Kusumaningtyas, Bethari. (1404). 'Assessing Teacher Satisfaction with the SistaUKS System: A New Approach to School Health Program Stratification', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 13(3), pp. 283-292. doi: 10.30476/jhsss.2024.103047.1928
Umaroh, Ayu Khoirotul, Rayid Ramdhani, Muhammad, Nindyasari, Jenita Berlian, Kusnul Khotimah, Mabarod, Khoirunnisa, Salma, Mukti Kusumaningtyas, Bethari. Assessing Teacher Satisfaction with the SistaUKS System: A New Approach to School Health Program Stratification. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1404; 13(3): 283-292. doi: 10.30476/jhsss.2024.103047.1928

Assessing Teacher Satisfaction with the SistaUKS System: A New Approach to School Health Program Stratification

Journal of Health Sciences & Surveillance System
دوره 13، شماره 3، مهر 2025، صفحه 283-292    اصل مقاله (1.02 M)
نوع مقاله: Original Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/jhsss.2024.103047.1928
نویسندگان
Ayu Khoirotul Umaroh* 1؛ Muhammad Rayid Ramdhani2؛ Jenita Berlian Nindyasari1؛ Mabarod Kusnul Khotimah1؛ Salma Khoirunnisa1؛ Bethari Mukti Kusumaningtyas1
1Department of Public Health, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Central Java, 57102, Indonesia
2Electrical Engineering, University of Padjajaran, West Java, 45363, Indonesia
چکیده
Background: The School Health Program (UKS) is assessed to enhance its effectiveness in improving students’ health levels. SistaUKS, a health information system comprising software and data, facilitates the automation of the UKS stratification assessment process. Evaluating this system is crucial for understanding user satisfaction, which enhances services and the system interface to increase user-friendliness. This study aimed to analyze teacher satisfaction regarding the utilization of the SistaUKS stratification system.
Methods: This is a descriptive quantitative study with a survey method. The sampling technique used was convenience sampling, which identified 33 junior high school teachers overseeing UKS in Boyolali Regency, who participated as respondents. Data were collected using a System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaire, including 10 items. The analysis involved converting the points to a standard scale, summing these points, normalizing the scores, and calculating the final score.
Results: The findings indicate an average satisfaction level of 68.41, placing user satisfaction within the marginally high acceptability range and earning an adjective rating of good. While the SistaUKS system is noted for its ease of use, the analysis suggests that improvements are necessary for certain features to further enhance usability, for example, adding a Data Autosave Function. It could ensure that the system automatically saves data when users input it.
Conclusion: SistaUKS earns an adjective rating of good. This study underscores the importance of continual assessment and refinement of health information systems like SistaUKS to sustain high levels of user satisfaction and system efficiency.

تازه های تحقیق

Ayu Khoirotul Umaroh (Google Scholar)

کلیدواژه‌ها
Automation؛ Technology؛ Program evaluation؛ School health؛ Usability testing
مراجع
  1. World Health Organization. Making every school a health-promoting school [Internet]. 2021. Available from: http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/mediation/rules.
  2. Lee A, Lo ASC, Keung MW, Kwong CMA, Wong KK. Effective health promoting school for better health of children and adolescents: Indicators for success. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1). doi: 1186/s12889-019-7425-6. PUBMED PMID: 31409312; PUBMED CENTRAL PMCID: PMC6691553.
  3. Chen FL, Lee A. Health-promoting educational settings in Taiwan: development and evaluation of the Health-Promoting School Accreditation System. Glob Health Promot. 2016;23. doi: 1177/1757975916638286. PUBMED PMID: 27199014.
  4. Tsai M, Chen F, Luh D, Wang Y, Lo K. Effectiveness of health promoting school program: The relationship of HPS award level and outcome. Eur J Public Health. 2020;30(Supplement_5). doi: 1093/eurpub/ckaa166.366.
  5. Kemendikbud RI. Buku Pedoman Pembinaan dan Pengembangan UKS. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. 2019. 31–42 p.
  6. Budiono A, Sulistyowati M. Peran UKS (Usaha Kesehatan Sekolah) dalam Penyampaian Informasi Kesehatan Reproduksi Terhadap Siswa SMP Negeri X di Surabaya. Journal PROMKES. 2014;2(1):58–65.
  7. Fridayanti DV, Prameswari GN. Peran UKS (Usaha Kesehatan Sekolah) Dalam Upaya Penanggulangan Obesitas Pada Anak Usia Sekolah. JHE (Journal of Health Education). 2016;1(2):8–14.
  8. Adinda D. Peran Guru Dan Kejadian Obesitas Pada Siswa Sekolah Dasar Di Kota Medan. Jurnal Kesehatan. 2020;13(1). doi: 24252/kesehatan.v13i1.10898.
  9. Hidayati N, Fitriani IS, Wijayanti AR. Intervensi Pencegahan Kesenjangan Status Gizi Anak Sekolah. InitiumCommunityJournal [Internet]. 2023.
  10. Langford R, Bonell CP, Jones HE, Pouliou T, Murphy SM, Waters E, Komro KA, Gibbs LF, Magnus D CR. The WHO Health Promoting School framework for improving the health and well-being of students and their academic achievement (Review) Langford. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2014;(4):1–31. doi: 1002/14651858.CD008958.pub2. PUBMED PMID: 24737131; PUBMED CENTRAL PMCID: PMC11214127.
  11. Umaroh AK, Priyawati D, Susanto E, Arodah NI, Sujarwo A. Designing a Website-Based Information System with the Prototyping Method for Stratification of Usaha Kesehatan Sekolah in Boyolali District. Riset Informasi Kesehatan. 2023;12(2):198–207. doi: 30644/rik.v12i2.747.
  12. Vaganova E, Ishchuk T, Zemtsov A, Zhdanov D. Health information systems: Background and trends of development worldwide and in Russia. In: HEALTHINF 2017 - 10th International Conference on Health Informatics, Proceedings; Part of 10th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies, BIOSTEC 2017. 2017.
  13. Mwogosi A, Kibusi S, Shao D. Tools and Techniques for Decision Making in Healthcare Facilities in Tanzania: Usage, Challenges and Resolutions. J Health Inform Dev Ctries [Internet]. 16(1):2021.
  14. Yulianto D, Raditya A, Baswara C, Alhawariy L, Prasasti MI, Hariadi GA, et al. Development of Information and Management System of Student Competition Groups through User-Centered Design Approach. Khazanah Informatika. 2023;9(1). doi: 23917/khif.v9i1.17974.
  15. Lewis JR, Sauro J. The factor structure of the system usability scale. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). 2009.
  16. Nuswantari A, Wu YT, Surjono HD. System Usability Scale Measurement on Synhcronous Online Argumentation Learning System. In 2020 Proceedings of the International Conference on Online and Blended Learning 2019 (ICOBL 2019). doi: 2991/assehr.k.200521.031.
  17. Aripiyanto S, Azhari M, Munawarohman R, Masruroh SU, Khairani D, Sukmana HT. Usability Improvement Through User Interface Design with Human Centered Design (HCD) Method on Junior High School Websites. In: 2022 7th International Conference on Informatics and Computing, ICIC 2022. doi: 10.1109/ICIC56845.2022.10006921.
  18. Stapinski LA, Nepal S, Guckel T, Grummitt LR, Chapman C, Lynch SJ, et al. Evaluation of Positive Choices, a National Initiative to Disseminate Evidence-Based Alcohol and Other Drug Prevention Strategies: Web-Based Survey Study. JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2022;5(3). doi: 2196/34721. PUBMED PMID: 36018617; PUBMED CENTRAL PMCID: PMC9463616.
  19. Yada Giri IGP, Dewi LJE, Sunarya IMG. The Evaluation of Usability and Website Development using Cognitive Walkthrough, Performance Measurement, and System Usability Scale. Journal of Computer Networks, Architecture and High Performance Computing. 2023;5(2). doi: 47709/cnahpc.v5i2.2511.
  20. Klug B. An Overview of the System Usability Scale in Library Website and System Usability Testing. Weave: Journal of Library User Experience. Journal of Library User Experience. 2017;1(6). doi: 3998/weave.12535642.0001.602.
  21. Rohmad Khoirudin R, Putri DAP. Sistem Informasi Pengarsipan Surat Berbasis Website. Abdi Teknoyasa. 2022; 3(1). doi: 23917/abditeknoyasa.v3i1.455.
  22. Sulistyanto H, Anif S, Sutama S, Narimo S, Sutopo A, Haq MI, et al. Education Application Testing Perspective to Empower Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills Related to The Concept of Adaptive Learning Media. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE). 2022;4(3). doi: 23917/ijolae.v4i3.19432.
  23. Barroga E, Matanguihan GJ. A Practical Guide to Writing Quantitative and Qualitative Research Questions and Hypotheses in Scholarly Articles. J Korean Med Sci. 2022;37(16). doi: 3346%2Fjkms.2022.37.e121. PUBMED PMID: 35470596; PUBMED CENTRAL PMCID: PMC9039193.
  24. Brant JM, Haas-Haseman ML, Wei SH, Wickham R, Ponto J. Understanding and Evaluating Survey Research. J Adv Pract Oncol. 2015;6(2):168–71. doi: 6004/jadpro.2015.6.2.9. PUBMED PMID: 26649250; PUBMED CENTRAL PMCID: PMC4601897.
  25. Nasir, Sukmawati. Analysis of Research Data Quantitative and Qualitative. Jurnal Edumaspul. 2023;7(1):368–73.
  26. Lewis JR. Psychometric Evaluation of the PSSUQ Using Data from Five Years of Usability Studies. Int J Hum Comput Interact. 2002;14(3–4):463–88. doi: 1080/10447318.2002.9669130.
  27. Andrade C. The Inconvenient Truth About Convenience and Purposive Samples. Indian J Psychol Med. 2021;43(1). doi: 1177%2F0253717620977000. PUBMED PMID: 34349313; PUBMED CENTRAL PMCID: PMC8295573.
  28. Catalán JM, García-Pérez J V., Blanco A, Ezquerro S, Garrote A, Costa T, et al. Tele-rehabilitation versus local rehabilitation therapies assisted by robotic devices: A pilot study with patients. Applied Sciences (Switzerland). 2021;11(14). doi: 3390/app11146259.
  29. Welda W, Putra DMDU, Dirgayusari AM. Usability Testing Website Dengan Menggunakan Metode System Usability Scale (Sus)s. International Journal of Natural Science and Engineering. 2020;4(3). doi: 23887/ijnse.v4i2.28864.
  30. Diehl C, Martins A, Almeida A, Silva T, Ribeiro Ó, Santinha G, et al. Defining Recommendations to Guide User Interface Design: Multimethod Approach. JMIR Hum Factors. 2022;9(3). doi: 2196/37894. PUBMED PMID: 36178714; PUBMED CENTRAL PMCID: PMC9568819.
  31. Gao M, Kortum P, Oswald FL. Multi-Language Toolkit for the System Usability Scale. Int J Hum Comput Interact. 2020;36(20). doi: 1080/10447318.2020.1801173.
  32. Mjlae SA, Baker El-Ebiary YA, Abu-Ulbeh W, Hassan AH, Bamansoor S, Iryani S, et al. The Effectiveness of Management Information System in Decision-Making. J Mech Cont& Math Sci [Internet]. 2020;15:316–27. doi: 26782/jmcms.2020.07.00026.
  33. Chan CKY, Hu W. Students’ voices on generative AI: perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2023;20(1). doi: 1186/s41239-023-00411-8.
  34. Sauer J, Sonderegger A, Schmutz S. Usability, user experience and accessibility: towards an integrative model. Ergonomics. 2020;63(10). doi: 10.1080/00140139.2020.1774080. PUBMED PMID: 32450782.
  35. Chu A, Biancarelli D, Drainoni M, Schneider J, Wang C, Sheng A. Learning moment: Features of online asynchronous learning tools that maximize acceptance and adoption by medical students. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2018;19. doi: 5811%2Fwestjem.2019.6.42657.
  36. Bangor A, Kortum TP, Miller J. An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction. Int J Hum Comput Interact. 2008;24(6). doi: 1080/10447310802205776.
  37. Imana AG, Nugroho YS. UX (User Experience) Evaluation of The Open Learning System at Universitas Muhammadiyah Suarakarta Using Heuristic Evaluation and Usability Testing. Jurnal Teknik Informatika (Jutif). 2023;4(4):681–91. doi: 10.52436/1.jutif.2023.4.4.824.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 22
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 7


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب