LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,205
تعداد مقالات10,967
تعداد مشاهده مقاله74,070,649
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله45,656,342
Zarifsanaiey, Nahid, Barahmand, Nilofar, Mehrabi, Manoosh, Safarpour, Ali Reza. (1404). The Effectiveness of Immersive Educational Technologies Compared to Non-Immersive Ones on Clinical Skills among Nursing and Midwifery Students: A Protocol for a Systematic Review. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, (), -. doi: 10.30476/ijvlms.2025.105419.1326
Nahid Zarifsanaiey; Nilofar Barahmand; Manoosh Mehrabi; Ali Reza Safarpour. "The Effectiveness of Immersive Educational Technologies Compared to Non-Immersive Ones on Clinical Skills among Nursing and Midwifery Students: A Protocol for a Systematic Review". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, , , 1404, -. doi: 10.30476/ijvlms.2025.105419.1326
Zarifsanaiey, Nahid, Barahmand, Nilofar, Mehrabi, Manoosh, Safarpour, Ali Reza. (1404). 'The Effectiveness of Immersive Educational Technologies Compared to Non-Immersive Ones on Clinical Skills among Nursing and Midwifery Students: A Protocol for a Systematic Review', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, (), pp. -. doi: 10.30476/ijvlms.2025.105419.1326
Zarifsanaiey, Nahid, Barahmand, Nilofar, Mehrabi, Manoosh, Safarpour, Ali Reza. The Effectiveness of Immersive Educational Technologies Compared to Non-Immersive Ones on Clinical Skills among Nursing and Midwifery Students: A Protocol for a Systematic Review. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1404; (): -. doi: 10.30476/ijvlms.2025.105419.1326

The Effectiveness of Immersive Educational Technologies Compared to Non-Immersive Ones on Clinical Skills among Nursing and Midwifery Students: A Protocol for a Systematic Review

Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences
مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده، انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 25 خرداد 1404    اصل مقاله (499.84 K)
نوع مقاله: Protocol
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/ijvlms.2025.105419.1326
نویسندگان
Nahid Zarifsanaiey1؛ Nilofar Barahmand2؛ Manoosh Mehrabi* 1؛ Ali Reza Safarpour3
1Department of E-learning in Medical Sciences, Virtual School and Center of Excellence in E-Learning, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
2Libraries and Information Resources Office, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
3Gastroenterohepatology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
چکیده
Background: Learning clinical skills is one of the most crucial responsibilities of medical students, particularly for midwives and nurses. Nowadays, teaching clinical skills and simultaneously moving towards online training, such as using Immersive Educational Technologies (IETs), presents a challenge that midwives and nurses face. The primary objective of this study is to determine whether IETs, compared to Non-Immersive ones, is effective in clinical skills among nursing and midwifery students.
Methods: This protocol has been created in accordance with the recommendation from the Cochrane Collaboration. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) checklist has been used in planning this protocol. The health professions, including nursing and midwifery students, are the target populations of this study. We will include randomized clinical trials or controlled trials that investigate the effectiveness of IETs on clinical skills among nursing and midwifery students. Traditional clinical education learning methods, including face-to-face (didactic) learning, classroom learning, in-person clinical instruction, in-person clinical attachments, multimedia, games, and e-books, among others, are comparators. The primary outcome of this study is to measure clinical skill performance among nursing and midwifery students and compare the efficacy of IETs and non-immersive ones. Clinical skills should be measured objectively through clinical examination or a reliable and valid checklist for assessing clinical skills or clinical competence. Randomized clinical trials or controlled trials will be eligible for inclusion in the review.
Conclusion: Given the increasing growth of IETs, the findings of this study can be utilized by healthcare decision-makers to prioritize educational approaches based on their efficacy and efficiency, particularly during times of crisis.

تازه های تحقیق

Nahid Zarifsanaiey (Google Scholar)

Manoosh Mehrabi (Google Scholar)

کلیدواژه‌ها
Clinical Competence؛ Education؛ Distance؛ Nursing؛ Students
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  1. Modarres M, Geranmayeh M, Amini M, Toosi M. Clinical placements as a challenging opportunity in midwifery education: A qualitative study. Nurs Open. 2022;9(2):1015-1027. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1139. PubMed PMID: 35187838; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8859063.
  2. Ahmadi G, Shahriari M, Keyvanara M, Kohan S. Midwifery students’ experiences of learning clinical skills in Iran: a qualitative study. Int J Med Educ. 2018;9:64-71. doi: 10.5116/ijme.5a88.0344. PubMed PMID: 29537968; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5951782.
  3. Coyne E, Rands H, Frommolt V, Kain V, Plugge M, Mitchell M. Investigation of blended learning video resources to teach health students clinical skills: An integrative review. Nurse Educ Today. 2018;63:101-07. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.01.021. PubMed PMID: 29425738.
  4. Francis G, O'Brien M. Teaching clinical skills in pre-registration nurse education: value and methods. Br J Nurs. 2019;28(7):452-456. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2019.28.7.452. PubMed PMID: 30969876.
  5. Nashwan AJ, Mohamed AS, Kelly DR. Nursing education in the emergence of COVID-19. Open J Nurs. 2020;10(6):595-7. doi:10.4236/ojn.2020.106040.
  6. Ganji J, Shirvani MA, Motahari-Tabari N, Tayebi T. Design, implementation and evaluation of a virtual clinical training protocol for midwifery internship in a gynecology course during COVID-19 pandemic: A semi-experimental study. Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Apr;111:105293. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105293. PubMed PMID: 35134637; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8809642.
  7. Wanless S, Winterman E, Chapman J. Skills teaching in COVID lockdown in the UK: Lessons learnt. Nursing in the 21st Century. 2020;19(3):171-3. doi: 10.2478/pielxxiw-2020-0018.
  8. Terry VR, Terry PC, Moloney C, Bowtell L. Face-to-face instruction combined with online resources improves retention of clinical skills among undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Feb;61:15-19. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.10.014. PubMed PMID: 29153453.
  9. Ryan GV, Callaghan S, Rafferty A, Higgins MF, Mangina E, McAuliffe F. Learning outcomes of immersive technologies in health care student education: systematic review of the literature. J Med Internet Res. 2022;24(2):e30082. doi: 10.2196/30082. PubMed PMID: 35103607; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8848248.
  10. Baker CM. Immersive Technologies: Benefits, Challenges, and Predicted Trends. Handbook of Research on Digital Transformation, Industry Use Cases, and the Impact of Disruptive Technologies: Pennsylvania, USA: IGI Global; 2022. p. 34-54.
  11. Paes D, Irizarry J, Pujoni D. An evidence of cognitive benefits from immersive design review: Comparing three-dimensional perception and presence between immersive and non-immersive virtual environments. Autom Constr. 2021;130:103849. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103849.
  12. Hussain Z, Ng DM, Alnafisee N, Sheikh Z, Ng N, Khan A, Hussain A, Aitken D, Sheikh A. Effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality for improving knowledge and skills in medical students: protocol for a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2021;11(8):e047004. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047004. PubMed PMID: 34400451; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8370502.
  13. Barteit S, Lanfermann L, Bärnighausen T, Neuhann F, Beiersmann C. Augmented, mixed, and virtual reality-based head-mounted devices for medical education: systematic review. JMIR Serious Games. 2021;9(3):e29080. doi: 10.2196/29080. PubMed PMID: 34255668; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8299342.
  14. Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch V. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Hoboken: Wiley. 2019.
  15. Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, Shekelle P, Stewart LA; PRISMA-P Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015 Jan 2;350:g7647. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7647. Erratum in: BMJ. 2016 Jul 21;354:i4086. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4086. PubMed PMID: 25555855.

 

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 5
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 2


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب