LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات21
تعداد شماره‌ها1,307
تعداد مقالات11,951
تعداد مشاهده مقاله83,642,726
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله122,264,007
Sadeghi, Bahare, Pur Imani, Reza, Kiani, Hossein, Bayatiani, Mohamad Reza, Seif, Fatemeh. (1405). Comparison of the Measurement Uncertainty of Thermoluminescence Dosimeters (TLD-100 and GR-200) in Clinical Radiotherapy Energies. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 16(5), 365-372. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2410-1847
Bahare Sadeghi; Reza Pur Imani; Hossein Kiani; Mohamad Reza Bayatiani; Fatemeh Seif. "Comparison of the Measurement Uncertainty of Thermoluminescence Dosimeters (TLD-100 and GR-200) in Clinical Radiotherapy Energies". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 16, 5, 1405, 365-372. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2410-1847
Sadeghi, Bahare, Pur Imani, Reza, Kiani, Hossein, Bayatiani, Mohamad Reza, Seif, Fatemeh. (1405). 'Comparison of the Measurement Uncertainty of Thermoluminescence Dosimeters (TLD-100 and GR-200) in Clinical Radiotherapy Energies', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 16(5), pp. 365-372. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2410-1847
Sadeghi, Bahare, Pur Imani, Reza, Kiani, Hossein, Bayatiani, Mohamad Reza, Seif, Fatemeh. Comparison of the Measurement Uncertainty of Thermoluminescence Dosimeters (TLD-100 and GR-200) in Clinical Radiotherapy Energies. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1405; 16(5): 365-372. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2410-1847

Comparison of the Measurement Uncertainty of Thermoluminescence Dosimeters (TLD-100 and GR-200) in Clinical Radiotherapy Energies

Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering
دوره 16، شماره 5 - شماره پیاپی 1، دی 2026، صفحه 365-372    اصل مقاله (791.65 K)
نوع مقاله: Original Research
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2410-1847
نویسندگان
Bahare Sadeghi1؛ Reza Pur Imani1؛ Hossein Kiani2؛ Mohamad Reza Bayatiani3؛ Fatemeh Seif* 3
1Department of Physics, Arak University, Arak, Iran
2Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, Tehran, Iran
3Department of Medical Physics & Radiotherapy, Arak University of Medical Sciences & Khansari Hospital, Arak, Iran
چکیده
Background: Accurate determination of individual radiation doses is critical in dosimetry, and international standards emphasize the importance of reporting measurement uncertainties. Neglecting measurement uncertainty undermines the reliability of reported dosimetric values, as emphasized by international standards.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the measurement of uncertainties in two Thermoluminescent Dosimeters (TLDs)-100 and GR-200, in the dose range of 30–150 cGy.
Material and Methods: In this experimental study, we evaluated the measurement of uncertainties in two thermoluminescent dosimeters, TLD-100 and GR-200, in the dose range of 30–150 cGy. The study investigated both random (Type A) and systematic (Type B) uncertainties. Random uncertainties include the non-uniformity of dosimeter sensitivity Element Correction Coefficient (ECC), variability in dosimeter response at zero dose, and repeatability. Systematic uncertainties include the dependence of dosimeter response on radiation energy, radiation angle, nonlinearity of dosimeter response, fading, ambient light effects, and reference calibration errors.
Results: The total uncertainty for TLD-100 was calculated as 10.99% at a 68% confidence level (21.99% at 95% confidence), while for GR-200, it was 13.63% at a 68% confidence level (27.26% at 95% confidence). These values are well below the 42% threshold recommended by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) for personal dosimetry services. 
Conclusion: The GR-200 exhibits higher sensitivity for low-dose radiation detection; however, its greater uncertainty makes TLD-100 more suitable for clinical and personal dosimetry applications, where precision and reliability are paramount.

تازه های تحقیق

Fatemeh Seif (Google Scholar)

کلیدواژه‌ها
Radiotherapy؛ Uncertainty؛ Thermoluminescent Dosimetry؛ TLD-100؛ GR-200
مراجع
  1. Olko P. Advantages and disadvantages of luminescence dosimetry. Radiation Measurement 2010;45(3-6):506-11. doi: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2010.01.016.
  2. Horowitz YS, Moscovitch M. Highlights and pitfalls of 20 years of application of computerised glow curve analysis to thermoluminescence research and dosimetry. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2013;153(1):1-22. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncs242. PubMed PMID: 22987121.
  3. Phillips GO, Pedraza JM. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Programme in Radiation and Tissue Banking: Past, Present and Future. Cell Tissue Bank. 2003;4(2-4):69-76. doi: 10.1023/B:CATB.0000007021.81293.e4. PubMed PMID: 15256842.
  4. McKeever SW. Thermoluminescence of solids. Cambridge University Press; 1985.
  5. Horowitz YS, Satinger D, Oster L, Issa N, Brandan ME, Avila O, et al. The extended track interaction model: supralinearity and saturation He-ion TL fluence response in sensitized TLD-100. Radiation Measurements. 2001;33(5):459-73. doi: 10.1016/S1350-4487(01)00033-6.
  6. Jursinic PA. Characterization of optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters, OSLDs, for clinical dosimetric measurements. Med Phys. 2007;34(12):4594-604. doi: 10.1118/1.2804555. PubMed PMID: 18196786.
  7. Howell RM, Scarboro SB, Kry SF, Yaldo DZ. Accuracy of out-of-field dose calculations by a commercial treatment planning system. Phys Med Biol. 2010;55(23):6999-7008. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/23/S03. PubMed PMID: 21076191. PubMed PMCID: PMC3152254.
  8. Amit G, Datz H. Automatic detection of anomalous thermoluminescent dosimeter glow curves using machine learning. Radiation Measurements. 2018;117:80-5. doi: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2018.07.014.
  9. Hu JP, Reciniello RN, Holden NE. Optimization of the epithermal neutron beam for Boron Neutron Capture Therapy at the Brookhaven Medical Research Reactor. Health Phys. 2004;86(5 Suppl):S103-9. PubMed PMID: 15069299.
  10. Furetta C. Handbook of thermoluminescence. World Scientific; 2010.
  11. Hosseini Pooya S, Orouji T. Evaluation of Effective Sources in Uncertainty Measurements of Personal Dosimetry by a Harshaw TLD System. J Biomed Phys Eng. 2014;4(2):43-8. PubMed PMID: 25505769. PubMed PMCID: PMC4258862.
  12. Instrumentation IR. Passive integrating dosimetry systems for personal and environmental monitoring of photon and beta radiation. IEC; 2012.
  13. Reciniello R. Assessment of Occupational Exposure Due to External Sources of Radiation—IAEA Safety Guide RS-G-13. Health Physics. 2004;87(5):545-6.
  14. Stefanik J. Thermoluminescence dosimetry systems for personal and environmental monitoring (International Electrotechnical Commission Standard Publication 61066: 1991). Slovensky ustav technickej normalizacie (Slovakia); 2000.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 567
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,496


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب