Mehdizadeh, Mohammad, Karkoubzadeh, Abolfazl. (1404). Single-Suture versus Multiple-Suture Techniques Regarding Postoperative Pain, Trismus, Edema, Ecchymosis, and Operative Time in Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Wisdom Teeth: A Clinical Trial. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 26(3), 226-232. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2024.102038.2332
Mohammad Mehdizadeh; Abolfazl Karkoubzadeh. "Single-Suture versus Multiple-Suture Techniques Regarding Postoperative Pain, Trismus, Edema, Ecchymosis, and Operative Time in Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Wisdom Teeth: A Clinical Trial". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 26, 3, 1404, 226-232. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2024.102038.2332
Mehdizadeh, Mohammad, Karkoubzadeh, Abolfazl. (1404). 'Single-Suture versus Multiple-Suture Techniques Regarding Postoperative Pain, Trismus, Edema, Ecchymosis, and Operative Time in Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Wisdom Teeth: A Clinical Trial', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 26(3), pp. 226-232. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2024.102038.2332
Mehdizadeh, Mohammad, Karkoubzadeh, Abolfazl. Single-Suture versus Multiple-Suture Techniques Regarding Postoperative Pain, Trismus, Edema, Ecchymosis, and Operative Time in Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Wisdom Teeth: A Clinical Trial. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1404; 26(3): 226-232. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2024.102038.2332
Single-Suture versus Multiple-Suture Techniques Regarding Postoperative Pain, Trismus, Edema, Ecchymosis, and Operative Time in Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Wisdom Teeth: A Clinical Trial
1Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Qom University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Qom, Iran.
2Student Research Committee, Faculty of Dentistry, Qom University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Qom, Iran.
چکیده
Background:Surgical removal of impacted mandibular wisdom teeth may be associated with postoperative complications such as infection, bleeding, edema, pain, ecchymosis and trismus. It seems that the number of sutures and the duration of surgery for impacted wisdom teeth are among the factors affecting the aforementioned complications. Purpose:This study aimed to compare single-suture versus multiple-suture techniques regarding postoperative pain, trismus, edema, ecchymosis, and operating time in surgical removal of impacted mandibular wisdom teeth by envelope flap surgery. Materials and Method:This double-blind split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted on 30 patients requiring bilateral surgical extraction of impacted wisdom teeth with the same level of impaction through an envelope flap. In each patient, wisdom teeth of one randomly selected quadrant was extracted through an envelope flap and single-suture technique (experimental group) while the wisdom teeth of the other quadrant was extracted through an envelope flap by multiple-suture technique (control group). The two groups were compared regarding operative time, and also pain score, trismus (mouth opening), edema, and ecchymosis at 1, 3 and 7 days postoperatively using paired t-test (alpha= 0.05). Results:The two groups had no significant difference in pain score, edema, and ecchymosis at any time point (p> 0.05). The operative time (p= 0.005) was significantly longer, and mouth opening at 1, 3 and 7 days postoperatively (p< 0.05) was significantly smaller in the multiple-suture group. Conclusion:In the present study, postoperative trismus was significantly lower in the single-suture group than multiple-suture group, and the multiple-suture group had significantly longer operative time. Thus, single-suture technique appears to be superior to multiple-suture technique, and may be suggested for surgical removal of impacted mandibular wisdom teeth.
Osunde OD, Adebola RA, Saheeb BD. A comparative study of the effect of suture-less and multiple suture techniqus on inflammatory complications following third molar surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012; 41: 1275-1279.
Moghaddamnia AA, Nosrati K, Mehdizadeh M, Milani S, Aghvami M. A comparative study of the effect of prednisolone and celecoxib on MMO (maximum mouth opening) and pain following removal of impacted mandibular third molars. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2013; 12: 184-187.
Yaghmaei M, Rajabi L, Yavari A. Clinical assessment of the post operation wound infection incidence in 100 impacted third molars at OMFS Dep. School of Shahid Beheshti during 2000. J Dent Sch Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci. 2004; 22: 347-353.
Sağlam AA. Effects of tube drain with primary closure technique on postoperative trismus and swelling after removal of fully impacted mandibular third molars. Quintessence Int. 2003; 34: 143-147.
Holland CS, Hindle MO. The influence of closure or dressing of third molar sockets on post-operative swelling and pain. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1984; 22: 65-71.
Hupp JR, Tucker MR, Ellis E. Contemporary oral and maxillofacial surgery. 7th ed. Elsevier: Philadelphia PA; 2019. p. 169-171.
Hashemi HM, Beshkar M, Aghajani R. The effect of sutureless wound closure on postoperative pain and swelling after impacted mandibular third molar surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012; 50: 256-258.
Danda AK, Krishna Tatiparthi M, Narayanan V, Siddareddi A. Influence of primary and secondary closure of surgical wound after impacted mandibular third molar removal on postoperative pain and swelling--a comparative and split mouth study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010; 68: 309-312.
Vishal, Khaitan T, Ranjan R, Sharma N. Primary closure after surgical extraction of mandibular third molar with or without tube drain: A prospective study. J Family Med Prim Care. 2020; 9: 637-641.
Osunde OD, Saheeb BD, Adebola RA. Comparative study of effect of single and multiple suture techniques on inflammatory complications after third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 69: 971-976.
Maria A, Malik M, Virang P. Comparison of primary and secondary closure of the surgical wound after removal of impacted mandibular third molars. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2012; 11: 276-283.
Pasqualini D, Cocero N, Castella A, Mela L, Bracco P. Primary and secondary closure of the surgical wound after removal of impacted mandibular third molars: a comparative study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005; 34: 52-57.
Waite PD, Cherala S. Surgical outcomes for suture-less surgery in 366 impacted third molar patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006; 64: 669-673.
Koyuncu B, Zeytinoğlu M, Tetik A, Gomel MM. Effect of tube drainage compared with conventional suturing on postoperative discomfort after extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015; 53: 63-67.
Chaudhary M, Singh M, Singh S, Singh SP, Kaur G. Primary and secondary closure technique following removal of impacted mandibular third molars: A comparative study. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2012; 3: 10-14.
Pachipulusu PK, S M. Comparative study of primary and secondary closure of the surgical wound after removal of impacted mandibular third molars. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018; 22: 261-266.
Singh N, Kumar M, Singh S, Srivastava ASR. Primary closure versus secondary closure after third molar surgery: a comparative evaluation of postooperative sequelae. Int J Contemp Med Surg Radio. 2020; 5: 52-55.
Takadoum S, Douilly G, de*Boutray M, Kabani S, Maladière E, Demattei C, et al. Sutureless socket technique after removal of third molars: a multicentric, open, randomized controlled trial. BMC Oral Health. 2022; 22: 256.
Aggarwal V, Umarani M, Baliga SD, Issrani R, Prabhu N. Comparison between primary and secondary method of closing surgical wound after tooth extraction: a split-mouth study. Pesqui Bras Odontopediatria Clín Integr. 2021; 21: e0227.
