LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,262
تعداد مقالات11,502
تعداد مشاهده مقاله81,854,814
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله120,988,221
Javidi, Razieh, Yazdanpanah, Abbas, Moradi, Nasrin, Adin Alvani, Jamal. (1402). Survey of ergonomic management in health houses of Arsanjan city in 2023. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 11(1), 25-33. doi: 10.30476/jhmi.2024.103742.1237
Razieh Javidi; Abbas Yazdanpanah; Nasrin Moradi; Jamal Adin Alvani. "Survey of ergonomic management in health houses of Arsanjan city in 2023". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 11, 1, 1402, 25-33. doi: 10.30476/jhmi.2024.103742.1237
Javidi, Razieh, Yazdanpanah, Abbas, Moradi, Nasrin, Adin Alvani, Jamal. (1402). 'Survey of ergonomic management in health houses of Arsanjan city in 2023', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 11(1), pp. 25-33. doi: 10.30476/jhmi.2024.103742.1237
Javidi, Razieh, Yazdanpanah, Abbas, Moradi, Nasrin, Adin Alvani, Jamal. Survey of ergonomic management in health houses of Arsanjan city in 2023. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1402; 11(1): 25-33. doi: 10.30476/jhmi.2024.103742.1237

Survey of ergonomic management in health houses of Arsanjan city in 2023

Health Management & Information Science
دوره 11، شماره 1، فروردین 2024، صفحه 25-33    اصل مقاله (264.46 K)
نوع مقاله: Original Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/jhmi.2024.103742.1237
نویسندگان
Razieh Javidi1؛ Abbas Yazdanpanah* 2؛ Nasrin Moradi3؛ Jamal Adin Alvani4
1Master's student, Department of Health and Medical Services Management, Marvasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht, Iran
2Assistant professor, Department of Health Services Administration, Marvdasht branch, Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht, Iran
3Ph.D in health service management, Department of health services management, School of health management and information science, shiraz University of Medical Sciences,shiraz, Iran, 0000000251102133
4Faculty of Medicine, Islamic Azad University, Kazerun Branch, Kazerun, Iran
چکیده
Introduction: Health care workers are frontline service providers who play a vital role in maintaining and improving health community. They may be injured due to poor ergonomics in the work environment and the provision of optimal health care may be disrupted. Ergonomic management can protect these workers from irreversible complications. For which the present study has investigated the ergonomics management in health houses in Arsanjan city.
Method: This qualitative study was conducted in 2023 . 11 participants were selected by purposive sampling. The data collection method was semi-structured interviews with health workers working in health centers through the phone, Data analysis was done using qualitative content analysis.
Results: Four main Content were identified:" The state of education, The state of demographic variables, The state of equipment and The state of work environment of health workers working " and 20 sub-themes.
Discussion and conclusion: This study shows that, the ergonomic condition of the work environment was favorable in most of the health houses and unfavorable in some of the old health houses. Most of the health workers did not know about the correct ergonomics of using the computer, the sitting position and touching the mouse, but they reported the favorable condition the ventilation condition, the appropriate size of the door, the exit location and the presence of some equipment. Therefore, considering that the lack of sufficient training is the most important known ergonomic problem, this study suggested that managers of health house hold annual training courses on ergonomics in the workplace.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Health Workers؛ Work Environment؛ Ergonomics Management
مراجع
  1. Leigh JP, Waehrer G, Miller TR, McCurdy SA. Costs differences across demographic groups and types of occupational injuries and illnesses. American journal of industrial medicine. 2006;49(10):845-53.
  2. Halvani G, Ebrahimzadeh M, Nabi Meybodi R, Forooghi Nasab F. Study of occupational accidents occurred in one of the uranium mines in the central region of Iran during 2006-2010. Occupational Medicine Quarterly Journal. 2012;4(3):52-61.
  3. Whitman MV, Halbesleben JR, Holmes IV O. Abusive supervision and feedback avoidance: The mediating role of emotional exhaustion. Journal of organizational behavior. 2014;35(1):38-53.
  4. Piranveyseh P, Motamedzade M, Osatuke K, Mohammadfam I, Moghimbeigi A, Soltanzadeh A, Mohammadi H. Association between psychosocial, organizational and personal factors and prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders in office workers. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics. 2016;22(2):267-73.
  5. Omidi MR, Omidi N, Meftahi H, Panahi M. Determining the Effect of Ergonomic Principles of the Work Environment on the Burnout of Employees of Ilam Petrochemical Company with the Role of Safety Culture Moderator. Iranian Journal of Ergonomics. 2023;10(4):259-66.
  6. Pilerodi S. Health networks in Iran. 2007.
  7. Asadi-Lari M, Sayyari A, Akbari M, Gray D. Public health improvement in Iran—lessons from the last 20 years. Public health. 2004;118(6):395-402.
  8. Kodle NR, Bhosle SP, Pansare VB. Ergonomic risk assessment of tasks performed by workers in granite and marble units using ergonomics tool’s REBA. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2023;72:1903-16.
  9. Rahbar M. Primary health care in Islamic Republic of Iran. Series of Health Report in. 2009.
  10. Hasani S, Mobaraki H, Moghadami Fard Z. The importance of ergonomics in increasing productivity and improving the performance of the staff of the Ministry of Health. Therapy and Medical Education tkj. 2013;4(4):92-101.
  11. Marschall M, Harrington A, Steele J. Effect of work station design on sitting posture in young children. Ergonomics. 1995;38(9):1932-40.
  12. Snow DA. Plant engineer's reference book: Elsevier; 2001.
  13. Koohsari MJ, McCormack GR, Nakaya T, Shibata A, Ishii K, Lin C-Y, et al. Perceived workplace layout design and work-related physical activity and sitting time. Building and Environment. 2022;211:108739.
  14. Lima TM, Coelho DA. Ergonomic and psychosocial factors and musculoskeletal complaints in public sector administration–a joint monitoring approach with analysis of association. International journal of industrial ergonomics. 2018;66:85-94.
  15. Van Vledder N, Louw Q. The effect of a workstation chair and computer screen height adjustment on neck and upper back musculoskeletal pain and sitting comfort in office workers. The South African journal of physiotherapy. 2015;71(1).
  16. Al-Nakhli H, Bakheet H. The impact of improper body posture on office workers’ health. Int J Innov Res Med Sci. 2020;5(05):147-51.
  17. Steinmo SH, Michie S, Fuller C, Stanley S, Stapleton C, Stone SP. Bridging the gap between pragmatic intervention design and theory: using behavioural science tools to modify an existing quality improvement programme to implement “Sepsis Six”. Implementation science. 2015;11:1-12.
  18. Chanchai W, Songkham W, Ketsomporn P, Sappakitchanchai P, Siriwong W, Robson MG. The impact of an ergonomics intervention on psychosocial factors and musculoskeletal symptoms among Thai hospital orderlies. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2016;13(5):464.
  19. Ulutasdemir N, Kilic M, Zeki Ö, Begendi F. Effects of occupational health and safety on healthy lifestyle behaviors of workers employed in a private company in Turkey. Annals of global health. 2015;81(4):503-11.
  20. Samieizadeh Toosi T, Jadgal MS, Kathiri N, Javanmard R. Investigating Factors Related to Job Burnout in Health Workers of Iranshahr City in 1400. Journal of Jiroft University of Medical Sciences. 2023;10(3):1320-8.
  21. Pozas M, Letzel-Alt V, Schwab S. The effects of differentiated instruction on teachers’ stress and job satisfaction. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2023;122:103962.
  22. Rafieepour A, Rafieepour E, Sadeghian M. Effectiveness of ergonomics training in decreasing the risk of musculoskeletal disorders based on rapid upper limb assessment among computer operators. Iranian Journal of Ergonomics. 2015;3(1):25-32.
  23. Prajogo DI, Hong SW. The effect of TQM on performance in R&D environments: A perspective from South Korean firms. Technovation. 2008;28(12):855-63.
  24. Homayounfar M, Fadaei Eshkiki M, Sedaghat R. The effect of safety management system practices, ethical leadership and self-efficacy on safety behaviour of workers in hard and harmful jobs in manufacturing industries of Guilan province. Iranian Journal of Ergonomics. 2018;6(1):65-74.
  25. Moharrami M, MoavenSaeidi M, Khajavian N. Relationship between occupational hazards and Adverse pregnancy outcome in health care workers in Gonabad University of Medical Sciences. Occupational Medicine. 2023.
  26. Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse education today. 2004;24(2):105-12.
  27. Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Handbook of qualitative research. 1994;2(163-194):105.
  28. Man SS, Alabdulkarim S, Chan AHS, Zhang T. The acceptance of personal protective equipment among Hong Kong construction workers: An integration of technology acceptance model and theory of planned behavior with risk perception and safety climate. Journal of safety research. 2021;79:329-40.
  29. Sema W, Tessema M. Utilization of personal protective equipment and associated factors among large-scale factory workers using health belief model in Debre-Berhan town, Amhara region, Ethiopia, 2021. 2021.
  30. Nykänen M, Puro V, Tiikkaja M, Kannisto H, Lantto E, Simpura F, et al. Evaluation of the efficacy of a virtual reality-based safety training and human factors training method: study protocol for a randomised-controlled trial. Injury prevention. 2020;26(4):360-9.
  31. Robertson MM, Huang Y-H, O’Neill MJ, Schleifer LM. Flexible workspace design and ergonomics training: Impacts on the psychosocial work environment, musculoskeletal health, and work effectiveness among knowledge workers. Applied ergonomics. 2008;39(4):482-94.
  32. Mahmud N, Kenny DT, Zein RM, Hassan SN. Ergonomic training reduces musculoskeletal disorders among office workers: results from the 6-month follow-up. The Malaysian journal of medical sciences: MJMS. 2011;18(2):16.
  33. Rafeemanesh E, Esmaily H, Rahimpour F, Fahoul MJ, Herati H, Jahed Taherani H. Evaluation of workplace hazards and their effect on the physical-mental health of wastewater treatment plant workers in Mashhad. Iranian Journal of Health and Environment. 2023;16(2):325-38.
  34. Haghighat GA, Kamali H, Eslami F, Esfandyari A, Mazloomi S, Jahfari J, Maleky S. Investigating the Environmental Health status of Schools in Jiroft city accordance with national unifying plan in 2019. The Journal of Tolooebehdasht. 2022.
  35. Fouad AM, Fahim AE, Bedewy AA, Al-Touny A, Al-Touny SA. Work-related musculoskeletal complaints and ergonomic risk factors among Egyptian anesthesiologists: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2024;24(1):279.
  36. Maroufi F, Salavati A, Marabi J, Foruzanfar F. Evaluation the effectiveness of ergonomic educational interventions by training the basics of ergonomics and exercise on neck pain in nurse staff of Tohid hospital of Sanandaj. Payavard Salamat. 2017;11(4):433-40.
  37. Pakzad A, Ghavam A, Aghaei Borzabad P. Evaluate the Ergonomic Status of Workstations in Gachsaran Health Center in 2019. Armaghane Danesh. 2021;26(5):827-37.
  38. Fadaei M, Homayounfar M, Soufi M, Daneshvar A. The Effect of Environmental and Ergonomic Stimuli of the Work Environment on Employees’ Behavior by the Mediating Role of General Health. Iranian Journal of Ergonomics. 2022;10(1):36-45.
  39. Choobineh A, Rahimifard H, Jahangiri M, Mahmoodkhani S. Musculoskeletal injuries and their associated risk factors in office workplaces. Iran occupational health. 2012;8(4).
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,274
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 793


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب