LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,262
تعداد مقالات11,502
تعداد مشاهده مقاله81,855,268
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله120,988,413
ShojaeiBaghini, Mahdie. (1402). A Bibliometric Analysis of the Minimum Data Set in Healthcare Research. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 11(1), 1-8. doi: 10.30476/jhmi.2024.102269.1216
Mahdie ShojaeiBaghini. "A Bibliometric Analysis of the Minimum Data Set in Healthcare Research". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 11, 1, 1402, 1-8. doi: 10.30476/jhmi.2024.102269.1216
ShojaeiBaghini, Mahdie. (1402). 'A Bibliometric Analysis of the Minimum Data Set in Healthcare Research', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 11(1), pp. 1-8. doi: 10.30476/jhmi.2024.102269.1216
ShojaeiBaghini, Mahdie. A Bibliometric Analysis of the Minimum Data Set in Healthcare Research. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1402; 11(1): 1-8. doi: 10.30476/jhmi.2024.102269.1216

A Bibliometric Analysis of the Minimum Data Set in Healthcare Research

Health Management & Information Science
دوره 11، شماره 1، فروردین 2024، صفحه 1-8    اصل مقاله (871.05 K)
نوع مقاله: Review
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/jhmi.2024.102269.1216
نویسنده
Mahdie ShojaeiBaghini*
Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Medical University Campus, Haft-Bagh Highway, Kerman, Iran
چکیده
Introduction: The minimum data set is the first important step in developing a health information system. Considering that in recent years we have been faced with growth and accumulation in the minimum data set research. Therefore, the aim of this study is to conduct a systematic library analysis of the minimum data set and understanding of the field of research and trends.
Methods: The present study, with the scientific mapping, and bibliometric approach, examined the scientific publications in the minimum data set research in the PubMed on May 16, 2022. Searches were not limited by publication type, date, or language. The data were exported to Microsoft Excel 2016 and Mendeley Desktop version 1.19.8. after screening based on PRISMA checklist, bibliometric analysis, and scientific mapping were done using the RStudio package and the VOSviewer software tool.
Results: About 35 % of the publications in the field have been published since 2017 and mainly in the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society and Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. The top and most popular authors are MOR V., Fries B.e. And j.n. Morris, that has strong cooperation relationships. The United States also has the most scientific production, and most articles have been published nationally. The analysis of the author's keywords also showed the top five keywords are Humans, Aged, Female, Male and Standards.
Conclusion: Although global studies on minimum data set have a long history, they are still growing. Recently, it has shown promising applications in information systems and clinical research.
کلیدواژه‌ها
MDS؛ Minimum Data Set؛ Bibliometric Analysis؛ Mapping؛ Network Analysis
مراجع
  1. Yamin M, Alharthi S. Measuring impact of healthcare information systems in administration and operational management. Int J Inf Technol. 2020;12(3):767–74.
  2. Smolij K, Dun K. Patient health information management: searching for the right model. Perspect Heal Inf Manag [Internet]. 2006 Dec 12;3:10. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18066368%0Ahttp://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=PMC2047307
  3. Hajizadeh E, Shahmoradi L, Mahmoodi M, Rakhshan A, Nazari R, Barzgari S. Identification of the minimum data set to design a mobile-based application on overweight and obesity management for children and adolescents. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2021 Jun;20(1):1011–20.
  4. Hajesmaeel-Gohari S, Bahaadinbeigy K, Tajoddini S, R Niakan Kalhori S. Minimum data set development for a drug poisoning registry system. Digit Heal [Internet]. 2019 Dec 24;5:2055207619897155–2055207619897155. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32010449
  5. Ahmadi M, Madani T, Alipour J. Development a national minimum data set (MDS) of the information management system for disability in Iran. Disabil Health J [Internet]. 2019;12(4):641–8. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936657419301013
  6. Davey CJ, Slade S V., Shickle D. A proposed minimum data set for international primary care optometry: a modified Delphi study. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017;37(4):428–39.
  7. Mehraeen E, Safdari R, SeyedAlinaghi S, Mohammadzadeh N, Mohraz M. Common elements and features of a mobile-based self-management system for people living with HIV. Electron physician. 2018;10(4):6655.
  8. Lowe JR, Wallace SJ, Sam S, Young A. Minimum data and core outcomes for subacute rehabilitation: A scoping review. Clin Rehabil. 2022 Mar;36(3):388–406.
  9. Sheykhotayefeh M, Safdari R, Ghazisaeedi M, Khademi SH, Farajolah SSS, Maserat E, et al. Development of a minimum data set (MDS) for C-section anesthesia information management system (AIMS). Anesthesiol Pain Med. 2017;7(2).
  10. Bernardi FA, Yamada DB, de Oliveira BM, Lima VC, Félix TM, Alves D. The minimum dataset for rare diseases in Brazil: a systematic review protocol. Procedia Comput Sci [Internet]. 2022;196:439–44. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877050921022572
  11. Sabahi A, Asadi F, Shadnia S, Rabiei R, Hosseini A. Minimum Data Set for a Poisoning Registry: A Systematic Review. Iran J Pharm Res. 2021;20(2):473–85.
  12. Zakerabasali S, Kadivar M, Safdari R, Niakan Kalhori SR, Mokhtaran M, Karbasi Z, et al. Development and validation of the Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome Minimum Data Set (NAS-MDS): a systematic review, focus group discussion, and Delphi technique. J Matern neonatal Med  Off J  Eur Assoc Perinat Med Fed Asia Ocean Perinat Soc Int Soc Perinat Obstet. 2022 Feb;35(4):617–24.
  13. Halligan S, Altman DG, Taylor SA, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Bartram CI, et al. CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting. Radiology. 2005;237(3):893–904.
  14. Hutchinson AM, Milke DL, Maisey S, Johnson C, Squires JE, Teare G, et al. The resident assessment instrument-minimum data set 2.0 quality indicators: A systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10(1):1–14.
  15. Randolph J. A guide to writing the dissertation literature review. Pract assessment, Res Eval. 2009;14(1):13.
  16. Zhang JZ, Srivastava PR, Sharma D, Eachempati P. Big data analytics and machine learning: A retrospective overview and bibliometric analysis. Expert Syst Appl. 2021;184:115561.
  17. Guler AT, Waaijer CJF, Palmblad M. Scientific workflows for bibliometrics. Scientometrics [Internet]. 2016;107(2):385–98. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1885-6
  18. Peng C, He M, Cutrona SL, Kiefe CI, Liu F, Wang Z. Theme Trends and Knowledge Structure on Mobile Health Apps: Bibliometric Analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth [Internet]. 2020 Jul;8(7):e18212. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32716312
  19. Donthu N, Kumar S, Mukherjee D, Pandey N, Lim WM. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. J Bus Res [Internet]. 2021;133:285–96. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296321003155
  20. Guo Y, Hao Z, Zhao S, Gong J, Yang F. Artificial intelligence in health care: bibliometric analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(7):e18228.
  21. Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J  Off Publ Fed Am Soc  Exp Biol. 2008 Feb;22(2):338–42.
  22. National Library of Medicine. PubMed Overview [Internet]. Internet. 2023 [cited 2023 Jan 23]. p. 1. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/about/
  23. Milian EZ, Spinola M de M, Carvalho MM de. Fintechs: A literature review and research agenda. Electron Commer Res Appl [Internet]. 2019;34:100833. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1567422319300109
  24. Wang K, Herr I. Machine-Learning-Based Bibliometric Analysis of Pancreatic Cancer Research Over the Past 25 Years. Front Oncol. 2022;12.
  25. National Library of Medicine. Welcome to Medical Subject Headings [Internet]. National Library of Medicine. 2021 [cited 2022 Aug 13]. Available from: https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/meshhome.html?_gl=1*423gxf*_ga*Mzk4OTIwMTQuMTU5NTE0MDUyMA..*_ga_P1FPTH9PL4*MTY2MDM3NDU5OS4xLjEuMTY2MDM3NTExNy4w
  26. Stahl M, Abdel-Wahab O, Wei AH, Savona MR, Xu ML, Xie Z, et al. An agenda to advance research in MDS: A TOP 10 Priority List from the first international workshop in MDS (iwMDS). Blood Adv. 2022 Oct;
  27. Lowe JR, Wallace SJ, Sam S, Young A. Minimum data and core outcomes for subacute rehabilitation: A scoping review. Clin Rehabil [Internet]. 2021 Dec 7;36(3):388–406. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155211060468
  28. Cecconi FR, Moretti N, Dejaco MC. A Bibliometric Analysis on Costs Estimation of Building Retrofit. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. IOP Publishing; 2019. p. 12136.
  29. Aria M, Cuccurullo C. bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J Informetr. 2017;11(4):959–75.
  30. De Stefano D, Giordano G, Vitale MP. Issues in the analysis of co-authorship networks. Qual Quant. 2011;45(5):1091–107.
  31. Higaki A, Uetani T, Ikeda S, Yamaguchi O. Co-authorship network analysis in cardiovascular research utilizing machine learning (2009–2019). Int J Med Inform [Internet]. 2020;143:104274. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386505619314157
  32. Fonseca B de PF e, Sampaio RB, Fonseca MV de A, Zicker F. Co-authorship network analysis in health research: method and potential use. Heal Res Policy Syst [Internet]. 2016;14(1):34. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0104-5
  33. Jalali ZS, Introne J, Soundarajan S. Social stratification in networks: insights from co-authorship networks. J R Soc Interface. 2023;20(198):20220555.
  34. Fonseca B de PF e, Sampaio RB, Fonseca MV de A, Zicker F. Co-authorship network analysis in health research: method and potential use. Heal Res Policy Syst. 2016;14(1):34.
  35. Wang M, Chai L. Three new bibliometric indicators/approaches derived from keyword analysis. Scientometrics [Internet]. 2018;116(2):721–50. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2768-9
  36. Tripathi M, Kumar S, Sonker SK, Babbar P. Occurrence of author keywords and keywords plus in social sciences and humanities research : A preliminary study. COLLNET J Sci Inf Manag [Internet]. 2018 Jul 3;12(2):215–32. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/09737766.2018.1436951
  37. Grubbs JC, Glass RI, Kilmarx PH. Coauthor country affiliations in international collaborative research funded by the US National Institutes of Health, 2009 to 2017. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(11):e1915989–e1915989.
  38. Schodl K, Klein F, Winckler C. Mapping sustainability in pig farming research using keyword network analysis. Livest Sci. 2017;196:28–35.
  39. Huai C, Chai L. A bibliometric analysis on the performance and underlying dynamic patterns of water security research. Scientometrics. 2016;108(3):1531–51.
  40. Névéol A, Doğan RI, Lu Z. Author keywords in biomedical journal articles. AMIA . Annu Symp proceedings AMIA Symp. 2010 Nov;2010:537–41.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,294
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 671


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب