LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,224
تعداد مقالات11,157
تعداد مشاهده مقاله76,821,420
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله101,052,418
KEYKHA, AHMAD, BEHRAVESH, SARA, GHAEMI, FERESHTEH. (1403). ChatGPT and Medical Research: A Meta-Synthesis of Opportunities and Challenges. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 12(3), 135-147. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2024.101068.1910
AHMAD KEYKHA; SARA BEHRAVESH; FERESHTEH GHAEMI. "ChatGPT and Medical Research: A Meta-Synthesis of Opportunities and Challenges". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 12, 3, 1403, 135-147. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2024.101068.1910
KEYKHA, AHMAD, BEHRAVESH, SARA, GHAEMI, FERESHTEH. (1403). 'ChatGPT and Medical Research: A Meta-Synthesis of Opportunities and Challenges', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 12(3), pp. 135-147. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2024.101068.1910
KEYKHA, AHMAD, BEHRAVESH, SARA, GHAEMI, FERESHTEH. ChatGPT and Medical Research: A Meta-Synthesis of Opportunities and Challenges. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1403; 12(3): 135-147. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2024.101068.1910

ChatGPT and Medical Research: A Meta-Synthesis of Opportunities and Challenges

Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism
دوره 12، شماره 3، مهر 2024، صفحه 135-147    اصل مقاله (982.05 K)
نوع مقاله: Review article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/jamp.2024.101068.1910
نویسندگان
AHMAD KEYKHA* 1؛ SARA BEHRAVESH2؛ FERESHTEH GHAEMI3
1Department of Educational Administration and Planning, Faculty of Psychology and Education, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran
2Russian Language Department, Faculty of Literature, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran
3Department of Educational Methods and Programs, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده
Introduction: The utility of ChatGPT in research is ambiguous, serving as both a boon and bane and presenting challenges and opportunities. Accordingly, this study aimed to delineate the
merits and demerits of ChatGPT within the realm of research.
Methods: A meta-synthesis methodology involving a seven-step process was adopted to pursue the research objectives. Data were collected from comprehensive studies across specialized research databases, such as Science Direct, Springer, Eric, Emerald, Sage Journals, Wiley Online Library, PubMed, and Google Scholar, within the time frame spanning from 2022 to 2023. A total of 57 articles were meticulously chosen for analysis through judgmental sampling. Subsequently, key concepts were distilled from these articles and categorized using the thematic analysis approach while considering Karl Llewellyn’s octagonal model from 1963.
Results: The outcomes underwent scrutiny employing the thematic analysis strategy devised by Wolcott. The results about the capabilities and constraints of ChatGPT encompass eight dimensions, including formulating the research problem, reviewing relevant literature, selecting an appropriate research design, defining the population and choosing the sample, collecting data, analyzing data, interpreting data, and discussing and drawing conclusions. The credibility of these dimensions was substantiated through adherence to the criteria established by Lincoln and Guba.
Conclusion: ChatGPT manifests myriad potentialities and constraints within the research purview based on the results. In light of the expeditious progression of artificial intelligence across
multifarious domains, integrating this technological paradigm in research becomes an inexorable imperative, and excluding its use in research is untenable. Thus, policymakers and higher education strategists should devise policies that harness ChatGPT’s potential in research endeavors, engendering many opportunities.

تازه های تحقیق
کلیدواژه‌ها
Artificial intelligence؛ Natural language processing؛ Research activities؛ Research and development؛ Technology transfer
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  1. Islam I, Islam MN. Opportunities and challenges of chatgpt in academia: A conceptual analysis. Authorea Preprints. 2023. pp 1-9.
  2. Zheng H, Zhan H. ChatGPT in scientific writing: a cautionary tale. The American Journal of Medicine. 2023;136(8):725-6.
  3. Aljanabi M, Ghazi M, Ali AH, Abed SA. ChatGPT: open possibilities. Iraqi Journal for Computer Science and Mathematics. 2023;4(1):62-4.
  4. Liebrenz M, Schleifer R, Buadze A, Bhugra D, Smith A. Generating scholarly content with ChatGPT: ethical challenges for medical publishing. The Lancet Digital Health. 2023;5(3):e105-6.
  5. Macdonald C, Adeloye D, Sheikh A, Rudan I. Can ChatGPT draft a research article? An example of population-level vaccine effectiveness analysis. Journal of global health. 2023;13:01003.
  6. Van Dis EA, Bollen J, Zuidema W, van Rooij R, Bockting CL. ChatGPT: five priorities for research. Nature. 2023;614(7947):224-6.
  7. Jeyaraman M, Jeyaraman N, Nallakumarasamy A, Yadav S, Bondili SK. ChatGPT in Medical Education and Research: A Boon or a Bane? Cureus. 2023;15(8):e44316.
  8. Duong D, Solomon BD. Analysis of large-language model versus human performance for genetics questions. European Journal of Human Genetics. 2024;32(4):466-8.
  9. Marchandot B, Matsushita K, Carmona A, Trimaille A, Morel O. ChatGPT: the next frontier in academic writing for cardiologists or a pandora’s box of ethical dilemmas. European Heart Journal Open. 2023;3(2):oead007.
  10. Švab I, Klemenc-Ketiš Z, Zupanič S. New Challenges in Scientific Publications: Referencing, Artificial Intelligence and ChatGPT. Slovenian Journal of Public Health. 2023;62(3):109-12.
  11. Kitamura FC. ChatGPT is shaping the future of medical writing but still requires human judgment. Radiology. 2023;307(2):e230171.
  12. Fatani B. ChatGPT for future medical and dental research. Cureus. 2023;15(4):e37285.
  13. Gao CA, Howard FM, Markov NS, Dyer EC, Ramesh S, Luo Y, et al. Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to original abstracts using an artificial intelligence output detector, plagiarism detector, and blinded human reviewers. NPJ Digit Med. 2023;6(1):75.
  14. Sandelowski M, Barroso J. Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. USA: Springer Publishing Company; 2006.
  15. Finfgeld‐Connett D, Johnson ED. Literature search strategies for conducting knowledge‐building and theory‐generating qualitative systematic reviews. Journal of advanced nursing. 2013;69(1):194-204.
  16. García-Peñalvo FJ. The perception of Artificial Intelligence in educational contexts after the launch of ChatGPT: Disruption or Panic?. Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS). 2023;24:1-24.
  17. Karakose T. The utility of ChatGPT in educational research—Potential opportunities and pitfalls. Educational Process: International Journal. 2023;12:7-13.
  18. Peres R, Schreier M, Schweidel D, Sorescu A. On ChatGPT and beyond: How generative artificial intelligence may affect research, teaching, and practice. International Journal of Research in Marketing. 2023;40(2):269-75.
  19. Dai Y, Liu A, Lim CP. Reconceptualizing ChatGPT and generative AI as a student-driven innovation in higher education. Procedia CIRP. 2023;119:84-90.
  20. Eke DO. ChatGPT and the rise of generative AI: Threat to academic integrity?. Journal of Responsible Technology. 2023;13:100060.
  21. Javaid M, Haleem A, Singh RP, Khan S, Khan IH. Unlocking the opportunities through ChatGPT Tool towards ameliorating the education system. BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations. 2023;3(2):100115.
  22. Ivanov S, Soliman M. Game of algorithms: ChatGPT implications for the future of tourism education and research. Journal of Tourism Futures. 2023;9(2):214-21.
  23. Perera P, Lankathilaka M. AI in higher education: A literature review of chatgpt and guidelines for responsible implementation. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science. 2023;7:306-14.
  24. Rahman MM, Watanobe Y. ChatGPT for education and research: Opportunities, threats, and strategies. Applied Sciences. 2023;13(9):5783.
  25. Sallam M. ChatGPT utility in healthcare education, research, and practice: systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid concerns. InHealthcare. 2023;11(6):887.
  26. Abdulai AF, Hung L. Will ChatGPT undermine ethical values in nursing education, research, and practice. Nursing Inquiry. 2023;30:e12556.
  27. Pandey US. Exploring the Research Agenda for Large Language Models: Opportunities and Challenges for Scientific Research. Media Watch. 2023;14(2):127-30.
  28. Parse RR. Artificial Intelligence: Challenges for Education and Research. Nursing Science Quarterly. 2023;36(3):213-4.
  29. Meyer JG, Urbanowicz RJ, Martin PC, O’Connor K, Li R, Peng PC, et al. ChatGPT and large language models in academia: opportunities and challenges. BioData Mining. 2023;16(1):20.
  30. Willems J. ChatGPT at universities–the least of our concerns [Internet]. 2023 [Cited 20 Jan 2023]. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4334162 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4334162.
  31. Opara E, Mfon-Ette Theresa A, Aduke TC. ChatGPT for teaching, learning and research: Prospects and challenges. Tolorunleke Caroline: Opara Emmanuel Chinonso; 2023. p. 5.
  32. Sok S, Heng K. ChatGPT for education and research: A review of benefits and risks [Internet]. 2023 [Cited 6 March 2023]. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4378735 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4378735.
  33. Xames MD, Shefa J. ChatGPT for research and publication: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching. 2023;6(1):1-6.
  34. Cribben I, Zeinali Y. The Benefits and Limitations of ChatGPT in Business Education and Research: A Focus on Management Science, Operations Management and Data Analytics. Operations Management and Data Analytics [Internet]. 2023 [Cited 29 March 2023]. Available from: SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4404276 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4404276.
  35. Malik A, Khan ML, Hussain K. How is ChatGPT transforming academia? Examining its impact on teaching, research, assessment, and learning. Examining its Impact on Teaching, Research, Assessment, and Learning [Internet]. 2023 [Cited 9 April 2023]. Available from SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4413516 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4413516.
  36. Periaysamy AG, Satapathy P, Neyazi A, Padhi BK. ChatGPT: roles and boundaries of the new artificial intelligence tool in medical education and health research–correspondence. Annals of Medicine and Surgery. 2023;85(4):1317.
  37. Sedaghat S. Early applications of ChatGPT in medical practice, education and research. Clinical Medicine. 2023;23(3):278-9.
  38. Farrokhnia M, Banihashem SK, Noroozi O, Wals A. A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. 2024;61(3):1-5.
  39. Ring J. Artificial intelligence—ChatGPT and Scientific Publishing. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. 2023;37(7):1253-4.
  40. Hosseini M, Gao CA, Liebovitz DM, Carvalho AM, Ahmad FS, Luo Y, et al. An exploratory survey about using ChatGPT in education, healthcare, and research. MedRxiv. 2023:2023-03.
  41. Tay JQ. ChatGPT and the future of plastic surgery research: evolutionary tool or revolutionary force in academic publishing? European Journal of Plastic Surgery. 2023;46:1-2.
  42. Rahimi F, Talebi Bezmin Abadi A. Passive Contribution of ChatGPT to Scientific Papers. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 2023;51:2340-50.
  43. Arif TB, Munaf U, Ul-Haque I. The future of medical education and research: Is ChatGPT a blessing or blight in disguise?. Medical education online. 2023;28(1):2181052.
  44. Ruksakulpiwat S, Kumar A, Ajibade A. Using ChatGPT in Medical Research: Current Status and Future Directions. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare. 2023;16:1513-20.
  45. Hill-Yardin EL, Hutchinson MR, Laycock R, Spencer SJ. A Chat (GPT) about the future of scientific publishing. Brain Behav Immun. 2023;110:152-4.
  46. Dönmez İ, Sahin ID, Gülen S. Conducting academic research with the ai interface ChatGPT: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of STEAM Education. 2023;6(2):101-18.
  47. Burger B, Kanbach DK, Kraus S, Breier M, Corvello V. On the use of AI-based tools like ChatGPT to support management research. European Journal of Innovation Management. 2023;26(7):233-41.
  48. Tai AM, Meyer M, Varidel M, Prodan A, Vogel M, Iorfino F, et al. Exploring the potential and limitations of ChatGPT for academic peer-reviewed writing: Addressing linguistic injustice and ethical concerns. Journal of Academic Language and Learning. 2023;17(1):T16-30.
  49. Frigerio A. A preliminary analysis of the use of chatgpt in academic research. Абай атындағы. 2023;77(1):13-9.
  50. Zhu JJ, Jiang J, Yang M, Ren ZJ. ChatGPT and environmental research. Environmental Science & Technology. 2023;57(46):17667–70.
  51. Zielinski C, Winker M, Aggarwal R, Ferris L, Heinemann M, Lapeña JF, et al. Chatbots, ChatGPT, and Scholarly Manuscripts-WAME Recommendations on ChatGPT and Chatbots in Relation to Scholarly Publications. Afro-Egyptian Journal of Infectious and Endemic Diseases. 2023;13(1):75-9.
  52. Huang J, Tan M. The role of ChatGPT in scientific communication: writing better scientific review articles. American Journal of Cancer Research. 2023;13(4):1148.
  53. Zohery M. ChatGPT in Academic Writing and Publishing: A Comprehensive Guide. Egypt: Achtago; 2023.
  54. Wen J, Wang W. The future of ChatGPT in academic research and publishing: A commentary for clinical and translational medicine. Clinical and Translational Medicine. 2023;13(3):
  55. Subbaramaiah MT, Shanthanna H. ChatGPT in the field of scientific publication–Are we ready for it? Indian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2023;67(5):407.
  56. Yatoo MA, Habib F. ChatGPT, a friend or a foe? Integration of Artificial Intelligence-enabled chatbots in academic research. London: MRS Bulletin; 2023.
  57. Bhatia P. ChatGPT for academic writing: A game changer or a disruptive tool?. Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology. 2023;39(1):1.
  58. Huh S. Emergence of the metaverse and ChatGPT in journal publishing after the COVID-19 pandemic. Science Editing. 2023;10(1):1-4.
  59. Frederico GF. ChatGPT in Supply Chains: Initial Evidence of Applications and Potential Research Agenda. Logistics. 2023;7(2):26.
  60. McEachan JE, Lam WL. Response to concerns about the increasing influence of artificial intelligence in publishing. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2023;48(8):697-8.
  61. Dahmen J, Kayaalp ME, Ollivier M, Pareek A, Hirschmann MT, Karlsson J, et al. Artificial intelligence bot ChatGPT in medical research: the potential game changer as a double-edged sword. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2023;31(4):1187-9.
  62. Rahman MM, Terano HJ, Rahman MN, Salamzadeh A, Rahaman MS. ChatGPT and academic research: a review and recommendations based on practical examples. Rahman M, Terano HJR, Rahman N, Salamzadeh A, Rahaman S. ChatGPT and Academic Research: A Review and Recommendations Based on Practical Examples. Journal of Education, Management and Development Studies. 2023;3(1):1-12.
  63. Altmäe S, Sola-Leyva A, Salumets A. Artificial intelligence in scientific writing: a friend or a foe?. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 2023;47(1):3-9.
  64. Gottlieb M, Kline JA, Schneider AJ, Coates WC. ChatGPT and conversational artificial intelligence: Friend, foe, or future of research?. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2023;70:81-3.
  65. Esplugas M. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance academic communication, education and research: a balanced approach. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2023;48(8):819-22.
  66. Qasem F. ChatGPT in scientific and academic research: future fears and reassurances. Library Hi Tech News. 2023;40(3):30-2.
  67. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Judging the quality of case study reports. Internation Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. 1990;3(1):53-9.
  68. Wolcott HF. Writing up qualitative research. California: Sage publications; 2008.
  69. Lastrucci CL. The scientific approach: Basic principles of the scientific method. USA: Schenkman Pub; 1963.
  70. Dwivedi YK, Kshetri N, Hughes L, Slade EL, Jeyaraj A, Kar AK, et al. “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management. 2023;71:102642.
  71. Lund BD, Wang T, Mannuru NR, Nie B, Shimray S, Wang Z. ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence‐written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2023;74(5):570-81.
  72. Singh S, Djalilian A, Ali MJ. ChatGPT and ophthalmology: exploring its potential with discharge summaries and operative notes. Semin Ophthalmol. 2023;38(5):503-7.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,901
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 739


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب