LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,224
تعداد مقالات11,159
تعداد مشاهده مقاله76,959,709
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله101,147,368
SHEIKHBAHAEDDINZADEH, EFFAT, ASHKTORAB, TAHEREH, EBADI, ABBAS. (1402). Development of Postgraduate Psychiatric Nursing Students’ Clinical Competency Questionnaire. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 11(4), 240-251. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2023.98879.1814
EFFAT SHEIKHBAHAEDDINZADEH; TAHEREH ASHKTORAB; ABBAS EBADI. "Development of Postgraduate Psychiatric Nursing Students’ Clinical Competency Questionnaire". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 11, 4, 1402, 240-251. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2023.98879.1814
SHEIKHBAHAEDDINZADEH, EFFAT, ASHKTORAB, TAHEREH, EBADI, ABBAS. (1402). 'Development of Postgraduate Psychiatric Nursing Students’ Clinical Competency Questionnaire', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 11(4), pp. 240-251. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2023.98879.1814
SHEIKHBAHAEDDINZADEH, EFFAT, ASHKTORAB, TAHEREH, EBADI, ABBAS. Development of Postgraduate Psychiatric Nursing Students’ Clinical Competency Questionnaire. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1402; 11(4): 240-251. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2023.98879.1814

Development of Postgraduate Psychiatric Nursing Students’ Clinical Competency Questionnaire

Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism
دوره 11، شماره 4، دی 2023، صفحه 240-251    اصل مقاله (662.39 K)
نوع مقاله: Original Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/jamp.2023.98879.1814
نویسندگان
EFFAT SHEIKHBAHAEDDINZADEH1، 2؛ TAHEREH ASHKTORAB* 2؛ ABBAS EBADI3
1Department of Nursing, Ferdows branch, Islamic Azad University, Ferdows, Iran
2Department of Nursing Management, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran Medical Sciences Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Lifestyle institute, Nursing Faculty, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
چکیده
Introduction: As to the significance of clinical competency, the competency concept should be up-to-date periodically until clinical competency is evaluated based on it. This study aimed to develop and evaluate psychometric properties of a new tool to measure the postgraduate psychiatric nursing students’ competencies.
Methods: The current study was conducted with a sequential exploratory mixed-method, in Iran, in 2019 -2022. The qualitative part was conventional content analysis, and the quantitative part was a methodology study. The questionnaire was developed by the item generation via individual semi-structured interviews with 21 participants sampled purposefully, and a literature systematic review. In the quantitative phase, psychometric analysis was performed based on consensus-based standards for the selection of health status measurement instruments (COSMIN) criteria, and using face, content, and construct (i.e., convergent, known group, and exploratory factor analysis done on 199 postgraduate psychiatric nursing students by available sampling) validity. t-test analysis was used to compare the clinical competence ratings of two groups of experienced and inexperienced postgraduate psychiatric nursing students. Additionally, dependability was examined for internal consistency, stability over a one-month period, and measurement error. The sampling technique used for content validity was deliberate. Then, the responsiveness (through minimally detectable changes), and interpretability (through minimal important changes) were calculated.
Results: The questionnaire consisted of 43 items. Construct validity assessment via exploratory factor analysis (EFA) showed that 67.53% of the cumulative variance was explained by two factors: “Education and nursing care” (23 items) and “Evidence based psychiatric nursing interventions” (20 items). The convergent validity with one golden standard instrument was 0.49. The difference of the clinical competency scores of the two groups of experienced and novice was significant (P<0.001). The internal consistency of the entire instrument, and the first and second factors analyzed using alpha Cronbach (α) were respectively 0.947, 0.897, and 0.891. Stability was confirmed by the ICC agreement 0.956 for interrater (CI 0.907-0.980). Standard error of measurement was 3.14. The competency score of students based on their demographic information was not significant (P>0.05).
Conclusion: The 43-item postgraduate psychiatric nursing students’ clinical competency questionnaire is a valid and reliable newly developed instrument. Further studies are recommended to be conducted to assess competency with the largest sample size to promote instrument.

تازه های تحقیق

EFFAT SHEIKHBAHAEDDINZADEH (Google Scholar)

TAHEREH ASHKTORAB (Google Scholar)

کلیدواژه‌ها
Instruments؛ Clinical competence؛ Psychiatric nursing؛ Psychometrics؛ Postgraduate nursing education
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  1. Istomina N, Suominen T, Razbadauskas A, Martinkėnas A, Meretoja R, Leino-Kilpi H. Competence of nurses and factors associated with it. Medicina. 2011;47(4):230-7.
  2. Drennan J. Masters in nursing degrees: an evaluation of management and leadership outcomes using a retrospective pre‐test design. Journal of Nursing Management. 2012;20(1):102-12.
  3. Tajvidi M, Moghimi Hanjani S. The relation between critical thinking and clinical competence in nurses. Strides in Development of Medical Education. 2019; 16(1):e80152.
  4. Sim J, Crookes P, Walsh K, Halcomb E. Measuring the outcomes of nursing practice: A Delphi study. Journal of clinical nursing. 2018;27(1-2):e368-78.
  5. Chen SC, Lee SK, Rong JR, Wu CC, Liu WI. The development and psychometric testing on psychiatric nurses of a nurse case management competence scale in Taiwan. Journal of Nursing Research. 2018;26(2):72-9.
  6. Lovrić R, Prlić N, Milutinović D, Marjanac I, Žvanut B. Changes in nursing students' expectations of nursing clinical faculties' competences: A longitudinal, mixed methods study. Nurse education today. 2017;59:38-44.
  7. Jalali R, Rigi F, Parizad N, Amirian Z. Comparison of undergraduate nursing education in Iran and George Washington University. Educational Research in Medical Sciences. 2016;5(2):64-73.
  8. Alaee Karahroudy F, Sheikhbahaeddinzadeh E. A comparison of the psychiatric nursing masters' curriculum in Iran and Canada. Strides in Development of Medical Education. 2020;17(1):1-6.
  9. Helminen K, Johnson M, Isoaho H, Turunen H, Tossavainen K. Final assessment of nursing students in clinical practice: Perspectives of nursing teachers, students and mentors. Journal of clinical nursing. 2017;26(23-24):4795-803.
  10. Bloomfield J, Fordham-Clarke C, Pegram A, Cunningham B. The development and evaluation of a computer-based resource to assist pre-registration nursing students with their preparation for objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs). Nurse Education Today. 2010;30(2):113-7.
  11. Adams S. Psychiatric mental health nursing: “A seat at the table.” J Am Psychiatr Nurs Assoc. 2015; 21:34‑7.
  12. Fukada M. Nursing competency: Definition, structure and development. Yonago Acta Med. 2018;61:1‑7.
  13. Rebueno MC, Tiongco DD, Macindo JR. A structural equation model on the attributes of a skills enhancement program affecting clinical competence of pre-graduate nursing students. Nurse Education Today. 2017;49:180-6.
  14. Regehr C, Bogo M, Donovan K, Lim A, Regehr G. Evaluating a scale to measure student competencies in macro social work practice. Journal of Social Service Research. 2012;38(1):100-9.
  15. Immonen K, Oikarainen A, Tomietto M, Kääriäinen M, Tuomikoski AM, Kaučič BM, et al. Assessment of nursing students' competence in clinical practice: a systematic review of reviews. International journal of nursing studies. 2019;100:103414.
  16. Mohtashami J, Salsali M, Pazargadi M, Manoochehri H, Majd HA. Competency-based curriculum education in mental health nursing. Open Journal of Nursing. 2013;3(8):545-51.
  17. American Psychiatric Nurses Association. Psychiatric-mental health nurse essential competencies for assessment and management of individuals at risk for suicide [Internet]. 2015 [Cited 22 March 2015]. Available from: http//www.apna.org/i4a/pages/index Cfm.
  18. Axley L. Competency: A concept analysis. Nursing forum. 2008;43(4):214-22.
  19. Mwaniki MC, Abuya T. Evaluation of a Tool for Assessing Clinical Competence of Msc Nurse Students. Evaluation. 2013;3(13):53-61.
  20. McKnight SE. Mental health learning needs assessment: Competency-based instrument for best practice. Issues in mental health nursing. 2013;34(6):459-71.
  21. Jormfeldt H, Doyle L, Ellilä H, Lahti M, Higgins A, Keogh B, et al. Master’s level mental health nursing competencies, a prerequisite for equal health among service users in mental health care. International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being. 2018;13(sup1):1502013.
  22. Moskoei S, Mohtashami J, Ghalenoeei M, Nasiri M, Tafreshi MZ. Development and psychometric properties rating scale of “clinical competency evaluation in mental health nurses”: Exploratory factor analysis. Electronic physician. 2017;9(4):4155–61.
  23. Karimi-Moonaghi H, Gazerani A, Vaghee S, Gholami H, Salehmoghaddam AR, Gharibnavaz R. Relation between spiritual intelligence and clinical competency of nurses in Iran. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2015;20(6):665-9.
  24. McMullan M, Endacott R, Gray MA, Jasper M, Miller CM, Scholes J, et al. Portfolios and assessment of competence: a review of the literature. Journal of advanced nursing. 2003;41(3):283-94.
  25. Fahy A, Tuohy D, McNamara MC, Butler MP, Cassidy I, Bradshaw C. Evaluating clinical competence assessment. Nursing Standard. 2011;25(50):42-9.
  26. Nazari shadekam F, Ghorbani A, Karimi F, Sadeghi T. Identifying Effective Factors on Quality of Nursing Curriculum and Their Competence. RME. 2015;7(1):45-53.  Persian.
  27. Ebadi A, Zarshenas L, Rakhshan M, Zareyan A, Sharif Nia H, Mojahedi M. Principles of scale development in health science. 3rd edit. Tehran: Jame-e-Negar. 2018. Persian.
  28. Feng D, Li H, Meng L, Zhong G.  Development of a Questionnaire to Assess Nursing Competencies for the Care of People with Psychiatric Disabilities in a Hospital Environment. Psychiatr Q. 2018;89(3):699–706.
  29. Creswell JW. Research design qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Los Angeluses: SAGE. 2018.  pp: 342-43.
  30. Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse education today. 2004;24(2):105-12.
  31. Tobin GA, Begley CM. Methodological rigor within a qualitative framework. Journal of advanced nursing. 2004;48(4):388-96.
  32. Polit DF, Yang F. Measurement and the measurement of change: a primer for the health professions. Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer. 2016.  pp. 55-266.
  33. Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel psychology. 1975;28(4):563-75.
  34. Hyrkäs K, Appelqvist-Schmidlechner K, Oksa L. Validating an instrument for clinical supervision using an expert panel. International Journal of nursing studies. 2003;40(6):619-25.
  35. Gnaldi M, Matteucci M, Mignani S, Falocci N. Methods of item analysis in standardized student assessment: An application to an Italian case study. The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment. 2013;12:78-92.
  36. Mokkink LB, Boers M, Van Der Vleuten CP, Bouter LM, Alonso J, Patrick DL, et al. COSMIN Risk of Bias tool to assess the quality of studies on reliability or measurement error of outcome measurement instruments: a Delphi study. BMC medical research methodology. 2020;20:1-3.
  37. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 2010;63(7):737-45.
  38. Aminizadeh M, Farrokhi M, Ebadi A, Masoumi GR, Beyrami-Jam M, Khankeh HR. COSMIN Checklist for Systematic Reviews of the Hospital Preparedness Instruments in Biological Events. Journal of Nursing Measurement. 2021;29(3):1–22.
  39. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Stratford PW, Alonso J, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content. BMC medical research methodology. 2010;10(1):1-8.
  40. Munro B. Statistical methods for health care research. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams&Wilkins. 2005.
  41. Nulty DD. The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: what can be done? Assessment & evaluation in higher education. 2008;33(3):301-14.
  42. Liou SR, Cheng CY. Developing and validating the Clinical Competence Questionnaire: A self-assessment instrument for upcoming baccalaureate nursing graduates. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice. 2014;4(2):56.
  43. Nehrir B, Ebadi A, Vanaki Z, Nouri JM, Khademolhosseini SM. Psychometric properties of self-assessment clinical competency questionnaire in baccalaureate nursing students. Electron Physician. 2018;10(3):6494-9.
  44. Taghizadeh Z, Ebadi A, Montazeri A, Shahvari Z, Tavousi M, Bagherzadeh R. Psychometric properties of health related measures. Part 1: Translation, development, and content and face validity. Payesh (Health Monitor). 2017;16(3):343-57. Persian.
  45. Cordier R, Chen YW, Speyer R, Totino R, Doma K, Leicht A, et al. Child-report measures of occupational performance: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2016;11(1): e0147751.
  46. Schreiber JB, Nora A, Stage FK, Barlow EA, King J. Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of educational research. 2006;99(6):323-38.
  47. Bondy KN, Jenkins K, Seymour L, Lancaster R, Ishee J. The development and testing of a competency-focused psychiatric nursing clinical evaluation instrument. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing. 1997;11(2):66-73.
  48. Ward L. Mental health nursing and stress: Maintaining balance. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing. 2011;20(2):77–85.
  49. Abdalrahim A. Stress and coping among psychiatric nurses. Middle East Journal of Nursing & Health Sciences. 2013;7(4):30–7.
  50. Zarea K, Fereidooni-Moghadam M, Baraz Sh, Tahery N. Challenges encountered by nurses working in acute psychiatric wards: A qualitative study in Iran. Issues in Mental Health Nursing. 2018;39(3):244-50.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 5,045
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 590


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب