LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,224
تعداد مقالات11,189
تعداد مشاهده مقاله76,999,256
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله101,178,273
PAYDAR, PARVA, EBRAHIMPOUR, SHOLE, ZEHTAB HASHEMI, HANIEH, MOHAMADI, MEHDI, NAMAZI, SOHA. (1402). Design, Development and Evaluation of an Application based on Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) for Over-The-Counter (OTC) Therapy: An Educational Interventions in Community Pharmacists. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 11(2), 95-104. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2022.95843.1661
PARVA PAYDAR; SHOLE EBRAHIMPOUR; HANIEH ZEHTAB HASHEMI; MEHDI MOHAMADI; SOHA NAMAZI. "Design, Development and Evaluation of an Application based on Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) for Over-The-Counter (OTC) Therapy: An Educational Interventions in Community Pharmacists". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 11, 2, 1402, 95-104. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2022.95843.1661
PAYDAR, PARVA, EBRAHIMPOUR, SHOLE, ZEHTAB HASHEMI, HANIEH, MOHAMADI, MEHDI, NAMAZI, SOHA. (1402). 'Design, Development and Evaluation of an Application based on Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) for Over-The-Counter (OTC) Therapy: An Educational Interventions in Community Pharmacists', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 11(2), pp. 95-104. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2022.95843.1661
PAYDAR, PARVA, EBRAHIMPOUR, SHOLE, ZEHTAB HASHEMI, HANIEH, MOHAMADI, MEHDI, NAMAZI, SOHA. Design, Development and Evaluation of an Application based on Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) for Over-The-Counter (OTC) Therapy: An Educational Interventions in Community Pharmacists. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1402; 11(2): 95-104. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2022.95843.1661

Design, Development and Evaluation of an Application based on Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) for Over-The-Counter (OTC) Therapy: An Educational Interventions in Community Pharmacists

Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism
دوره 11، شماره 2، تیر 2023، صفحه 95-104    اصل مقاله (584.13 K)
نوع مقاله: Original Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/jamp.2022.95843.1661
نویسندگان
PARVA PAYDAR1؛ SHOLE EBRAHIMPOUR2؛ HANIEH ZEHTAB HASHEMI3؛ MEHDI MOHAMADI2؛ SOHA NAMAZI* 1، 4
1Clinical Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2Clinical Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Alborz, Iran
3Health Informatics Department, Virtual University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4Research Center for Rational Use of Drugs, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
چکیده
Introduction: Mobile health (mHealth) technology–based applications provide strong medical health-care support. Applications have an important impact as tools to improve the knowledge and support the health-care team practice. In this study, an over-the-counter (OTC) therapy application was developed based on Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS). CDSS is a key to improve health-related decisions and healthcare delivery. Furthermore, the quality and effectiveness of this application were evaluated among community pharmacists.
Methods: The application was designed and developed for 10 topics of OTC therapy. After the approval of the expert panel, 40 pharmacists affiliated with Tehran University of Medical Science (TUMS) participated in this before and after quasi-experimental study. The related scenarios and checklists were designed for the ten topics. The participants had
to manage the scenarios first by their knowledge and then with the application. The knowledge and pharmaceutical skills in OTC therapy were evaluated based on the obtained scores and the time recorded. The quality of the application was evaluated by pharmacists using user version of mobile application rating scale (uMARS) questionnaire. To compare
before/after measurements of parametric and non-parametric data, we used the paired t-test and Wilcoxon matched-pairs test, respectively. Besides, the variables was compared using Mann-Whitney test. The statistical significance was considered at P<0.05. The analyses were performed using the statistical software Stata (ver. 13).
Results: All scores after using the application increased, and the P-value w as n ot s ignificant. Also, the recorded time was increased after the use of the application, and the P-value was not significant. The minimum mean scores of the six uMARS questionnaire sections were 3. It means that acceptable scores were obtained in all sections of the questionnaire. The “App quality score” section of the application was reported 3.45±0.94. No relationship was found between gender and the median score of each section of the uMARS questionnaire.
Conclusion: The OTC therapy application developed in this study will help Persian-speaking pharmacists to increase their knowledge and pharmaceutical skills. 
کلیدواژه‌ها
Pharmacist؛ Mobile Application؛ Mobile Health؛ Clinical Decision Supports؛ Non-prescription Drug
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  1. Moritz K, Seiberth JM, Herrmann NS, Bertsche T, Schiek S. Are evidence-based criteria addressed during counseling on over-the-counter products? An observational study in community pharmacies. Patient Education and Counseling. 2021;104(11):2824-9.
  2. Hanafi S, Poormalek F, Torkamandi H, Hajimiri M, Esmaeili M, Khooie SH, et al. Evaluation of community pharmacists’ knowledge, attitude and practice towards good pharmacy practice in Iran. Journal of pharmaceutical care. 2013;1(1):19-24.
  3. Chang J, Lizer A, Patel I, Bhatia D, Tan X, Balkrishnan R. Prescription to over-the-counter switches in the United States. Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice. 2016;5(3):149.
  4. Tan BS, Goh AW, Chong CP. Utilization of non-prescription medicines in minor ailments management: A nationwide study undertaken among Malaysian community pharmacists. Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science. 2020;10(3):59-66.
  5. Negru DS, Cristea AN, Petculescu AM. Minimal consultation provided to patients presenting symptoms in the Romanian community pharmacy. Farmacia. 2010;58:601-10.
  6. Yeğenoğlu S, Çelikay G. Counselling of pharmacists to community on issues other than drug purchasing and drug related information: A survey in Ankara. Turkish Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2005;2(2):83-91.
  7. Soltani D, Ebrahimpour S, Hajimiri SH, Kohneloo AJ, Jahangard-Rafsanjani Z. Assessment of Antibiotic Dispensing Practice in Community Pharmacies of Tehran, for 2 Common Infectious Symptoms, Using Simulated Patient Method. Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research: IJPR. 2020;19(4):35.
  8. Zare M, Zarei L, Afifi S, Karimzadeh I, Ghaeminia M, Peiravian F, et al. The pharmacists’ patient care process in community pharmacy setting: evidence from Iran. Acta Bio Medica: Atenei Parmensis. 2020;91(3):e2020059.
  9. Negru DS, Cristea AN, Petculescu AM. Patient counselling at dispensing OTC medicines in the community pharmacy. Farmacia. 2012;60(1):102-10.
  10. World Health Organization [Internet]. Geneva: WHO Press. mHealth New horizons for health through mobile technologies. 2011 [Accessed 2 Jan 2017]. Available from: http://www.who.int/goe/publications/goe_mhealth_web.pdf.
  11. Zhao J, Freeman B, Li M. Can mobile phone apps influence people’s health behavior change? An evidence review. Journal of medical Internet research. 2016;18(11):e5692.
  12. Aungst TD. Medical applications for pharmacists using mobile devices. Annals of Pharmacotherapy. 2013;47(7-8):1088-95.
  13. Rivera J, McPherson A, Hamilton J, Birken C, Coons M, Iyer S, et al. Mobile apps for weight management: a scoping review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2016;4(3):e5115.
  14. iTunes Apple [Internet]; 2022 [Accessed 20 Jan 2022]. Available from: http://www.apple.com/itunes.
  15. Android Apps on Google Play [Internet]; 2022 [Accessed 7 Feb 2022]. Available from: https://play. google.com/store/apps.
  16. BlackBerry App World [Internet]; 2017 [Cited 25 April 2017]. Available from: https://appworld.blackberry.com.
  17. Short SS, Lin AC, Merianos DJ, Burke RV, Upperman JS. Smartphones, trainees, and mobile education: implications for graduate medical education. Journal of graduate medical education. 2014;6(2):199-202.
  18. Seppälä J, De Vita I, Jämsä T, Miettunen J, Isohanni M, Rubinstein K, et al. Mobile phone and wearable sensor-based mHealth approaches for psychiatric disorders and symptoms: systematic review. JMIR mental health. 2019;6(2):e9819.
  19. Raeisi A. Review of AIDS mobile applications and assessment of their quality using the Mobile Application Rating Scale [Doctoral dissertation]. Kerman University of Medical Sciences: School of Health Information and Management; 2021.
  20. NHS England. Self-care and over the counter items: A quick reference guide. UK: Guidance for CCGs; 2018.
  21. Zgarrick DP, Alston GL, Moczygemba LR, Desselle SP. Pharmacy Management: Essentials for all practice settings. 5th Edition. USA: McGraw Hill Medical; 2020.
  22. Nathan A. Non-prescription medicines. London: Pharmaceutical press; 2010.
  23. Rutter P. Community pharmacy: symptoms, diagnosis and treatment. UK: Elsevier; 2020.
  24. Krinsky D, Ferreri S, Hemstreet B, Hume A, Newton G, Rollins C, et al. Handbook of Nonprescription Drugs: An Interactive Approach to Self-Care. 20th edition. USA: American Pharmacists Association; 2019.
  25. Blenkinsopp A, Duerden M, Blenkinsopp J. Symptoms in the pharmacy: a guide to the management of common illnesses. 8th edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2020.
  26. Kashyap R. Systematic Model for Decision Support System: In Interdisciplinary Approaches to Information Systems and Software Engineering. USA: IGI Global; 2019. pp. 62-98.
  27. Lambrecht A, Vuillerme N, Raab C, Simon D, Messner EM, Hagen M, et al. Quality of a Supporting Mobile App for Rheumatic Patients: Patient-Based Assessment Using the User Version of the Mobile Application Scale (uMARS). Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:715345.
  28. Alroobaea R, Mayhew PJ. How many participants are really enough for usability studies?. In 2014 Science and Information Conference 2014 Aug 27. USA: IEEE. 48-56.
  29. Raeesi A, Khajouei R, Ahmadian L. Evaluation of HIV/AIDS-related mobile health applications content using an evidence-based content rating tool. BMC medical informatics and decision making. 2021;21(1):1-2.
  30. Roberts AE, Davenport TA, Wong T, Moon HW, Hickie IB, LaMonica HM. Evaluating the quality and safety of health-related apps and e-tools: Adapting the Mobile App Rating Scale and developing a quality assurance protocol. Internet Interventions. 2021;24:
  31. Grebenar D, Nham E, Likic R. Factors influencing pharmacists’ over-the-counter drug recommendations. Postgraduate Medical Journal. 2020;96(1133):144-8.
  32. Haghighi PD, Burstein F, Churilov L, Patel A. Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Mobile Triage Decision Systems. India: InDSS 2014 May 22. pp 54-65.
  33. Berner ES, McGowan JJ. Use of diagnostic decision support systems in medical education. Methods of information in medicine. 2010;49(4):412-7.
  34. Knitza J, Tascilar K, Messner EM, Meyer M, Vossen D, Pulla A, et al. German mobile apps in rheumatology: review and analysis using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS). JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2019;7(8):e14991.
  35. Jacobs RJ, Caballero J, Parmar J, Kane MN. The role of self-efficacy, flexibility, and gender in pharmacy students' health information technology readiness. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning. 2019;11(11):1103-10.
  36. Fernández-Lao C, Cantarero-Villanueva I, Galiano-Castillo N, Caro-Morán E, Díaz-Rodríguez L, Arroyo-Morales M. The effectiveness of a mobile application for the development of palpation and ultrasound imaging skills to supplement the traditional learning of physiotherapy students. BMC medical education. 2016;16(1):1-7.
  37. Free C, Phillips G, Galli L, Watson L, Felix L, Edwards P, et al. The effectiveness of mobile-health technology-based health behaviour change or disease management interventions for health care consumers: a systematic review. PLoS medicine. 2013;10(1):e1001362.
  38. Arnhold M, Quade M, Kirch W. Mobile applications for diabetics: a systematic review and expert-based usability evaluation considering the special requirements of diabetes patients age 50 years or older. Journal of medical Internet research. 2014;16(4):e2968.
  39. Maynard S, Burstein F, Arnott D. A multi-faceted decision support system evaluation approach. Journal of decision systems. 2001;10(3-4):395-428.
  40. Payne HE, Lister C, West JH, Bernhardt JM. Behavioral functionality of mobile apps in health interventions: a systematic review of the literature. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2015;3(1):e3335.
  41. McKay FH, Cheng C, Wright A, Shill J, Stephens H, Uccellini M. Evaluating mobile phone applications for health behaviour change: A systematic review. Journal of telemedicine and telecare. 2018;24(1):22-30.
  42. Chavez S, Fedele D, Guo Y, Bernier A, Smith M, Warnick J, et al. Mobile apps for the management of diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(10):e145-6.
  43. Kenny G, Connolly R. Towards an inclusive world: Exploring m-health adoption across generations. In Proceedings of the 25th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS). Guimarães, Portugal, June 5-10, 2017. pp. 1129-44.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,043
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 614


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب