LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,227
تعداد مقالات11,187
تعداد مشاهده مقاله77,405,506
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله101,684,992
AGARWAL, PRERNA, BHANDARI, BHARTI, GUPTA, VIVEK, PANWAR, APRAJITA, DATTA, ANJUM. (1401). Applicability of Concept Maps to Assess Higher Order Thinking in the Context of Indian Medical Education: An Analytical Study in the Subject of Physiology. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 11(1), 24-33. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2022.95660.1653
PRERNA AGARWAL; BHARTI BHANDARI; VIVEK GUPTA; APRAJITA PANWAR; ANJUM DATTA. "Applicability of Concept Maps to Assess Higher Order Thinking in the Context of Indian Medical Education: An Analytical Study in the Subject of Physiology". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 11, 1, 1401, 24-33. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2022.95660.1653
AGARWAL, PRERNA, BHANDARI, BHARTI, GUPTA, VIVEK, PANWAR, APRAJITA, DATTA, ANJUM. (1401). 'Applicability of Concept Maps to Assess Higher Order Thinking in the Context of Indian Medical Education: An Analytical Study in the Subject of Physiology', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 11(1), pp. 24-33. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2022.95660.1653
AGARWAL, PRERNA, BHANDARI, BHARTI, GUPTA, VIVEK, PANWAR, APRAJITA, DATTA, ANJUM. Applicability of Concept Maps to Assess Higher Order Thinking in the Context of Indian Medical Education: An Analytical Study in the Subject of Physiology. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1401; 11(1): 24-33. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2022.95660.1653

Applicability of Concept Maps to Assess Higher Order Thinking in the Context of Indian Medical Education: An Analytical Study in the Subject of Physiology

Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism
دوره 11، شماره 1، فروردین 2023، صفحه 24-33    اصل مقاله (1.61 M)
نوع مقاله: Original Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/jamp.2022.95660.1653
نویسندگان
PRERNA AGARWAL* ؛ BHARTI BHANDARI؛ VIVEK GUPTA؛ APRAJITA PANWAR؛ ANJUM DATTA
Department of Physiology, Government Institute of Medical Sciences, Greater Noida - 201310, Gautam Buddha Nagar, Uttar Pradesh, India
چکیده
Introduction: Concept mapping is a multidimensional tool that has been put to little use in India. We designed this study to check its applicability for assessing higher-order thinking in the subject of Physiology.
Methods: This interventional analytical study was carried out among 65 students of Phase I of MBBS in the year 2021. The students were sensitized to the technique and were given a practice session. On a pre-informed date, an assessment of a topic taught to them was done using concept mapping and a multiple-choice question (MCQ) based test. Feedback on the technique was taken from the students. The statistical tests used were test of normality – Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test, significance of association - Wilcoxon Signed Rank test, correlation - Spearman’s correlation, and agreement - Bland Altman Analysis. The discrimination index was calculated for both concept mapping and MCQ based tests, separately. Percentages were calculated for feedback questionnaire items. The data were analysed using Microsoft Excel (2019) and an online calculator. P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results: Students scored more in concept mapping. There was a significant difference in the scores of the students on the two tests (Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test, Z=-2.66, P=0.008) and a weakly positive non-significant correlation between them (Spearman’s correlation coefficient, rs=0.07, P=0.60). Bland Altman’s Analysis showed agreement in the scores of the students in the two tests. The mean score of the students in the two tests increased, so did the difference in the scores in the two tests. The discrimination index of concept mapping (0.28) was higher than that of the MCQ based test (0.18). Most of the students agreed on the advantages of concept mapping in the feedback.
Conclusion: The assessment result of concept mapping is better than that of MCQ-based test and it may be included as a teaching learning and assessment strategy in the context of Indian medical education in the subject of Physiology.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Concept mapping؛ Deep learning؛ Assessment؛ Metacognitive knowledge؛ Medical education
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  1. Ferris HA, O’ Flynn D. Assessment in Medical Education; What Are We Trying to Achieve? International Journal of Higher Education. 2015;4(2):139-44.
  2. Kibble JD. Best practices in summative assessment. Adv Physiol Educ. 2017;41(1):110-9.
  3. Morrissey B, Heilbrun ME. Teaching Critical Thinking in Graduate Medical Education: Lessons Learned in Diagnostic Radiology. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2017;4:1-5.
  4. Hobbins JO, Murrant CL, Snook LA, Tishinsky JM, Ritchie KL. Incorporating higher order thinking and deep learning in a large, lecture-based human physiology course: can we do it? Adv Physiol Educ. 2020;44(4):670–8.
  1. Palmer EJ, Devitt PG. Assessment of higher order cognitive skills in undergraduate education: modified essay or multiple choice questions? Research paper. BMC Med Educ. 2007;7:49.
  2. Tabish SA. Assessment methods in medical education. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2008;2(2):3-7.
  3. Sood R, Singh T. Assessment in medical education: evolving perspectives and contemporary trends. Natl Med J India. 2012;25(6):357-64.
  4. Khine A, Adefuye A, Busari J. Utility of concept mapping as a tool to enhance metacognitive teaching and learning of complex concepts in undergraduate medical education. Archives of Medicine and Health Sciences. 2019;7(2):267-72.
  5. Novak JD. Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education. J Res Sci Teach. 1990;27(10):937-49.
  6. Novak JD, Cañas AJ. The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How to Construct Them [Internet]. Technical Report IHMC Cmap Tools 2006-01, Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition. 2006 [Cited 2 May 2006]. Available at: http://cmap.ihmc.us/Publications/ResearchPapers/TheoryUnderlyingConceptMaps.pdf.
  7. Novak JD. Concept maps and Vee diagrams: two metacognitive tools to facilitate meaningful learning. Instr Sci. 1990;19:29–52.
  8. Pintoi AJ, Zeitz HJ. Concept mapping: A strategy for promoting meaningful learning in medical education. Med Teach. 1997;19(2):114-21.
  9. Gomes AP, Dias-Coelho UC, Cavalheiro PO, Siqueira-Batist R. The Role of Concept Maps in the Medical Education. Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica. 2011;35(2):275–82.
  10. Aslami M, Dehghani MR, Shakurnia A, Ramezani Gh, Kojuri J. Effect of Concept Mapping Education on Critical Thinking Skills of Medical Students: A Quasi-experimental Study. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2021;31(2):409-18.
  11. Mlika M, Ben Khelil M, Charfi R, Dziri C, Mezni F. Evaluation and acceptability of concept maps as a learning tool in medical studies. Tunis Med. 2019;97(5):606-12.
  12. Daley BJ, Durning SJ, Torre DM. Using Concept Maps to Create Meaningful Learning in Medical Education [version 1]. MedEdPublish. 2016;5:19.
  13. Torre DM, Durning SJ, Daley BJ. Twelve tips for teaching with concept maps in medical education. Med Teach. 2013;35(3):201-8.
  14. Mok CK, Whitehill TL, Dodd BJ. Concept map analysis in the assessment of speech-language pathology students' learning in a problem-based learning curriculum: a longitudinal study. Clin Linguist Phon. 2014;28(1-2):83-101.
  15. Bhusnurmath SR, Bhusnurmath B, Goyal S, Hafeez S, Abugroun A, Okpe J. Concept map as an adjunct tool to teach pathology. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2017;60(2):226-31.
  16. Joshi U, Vyas S. Assessment of Perception and Effectiveness of Concept Mapping in Learning Epidemiology. Indian J Community Med. 2018;43(1):37-9.
  17. Baliga SS, Walvekar PR, Mahantshetti GJ. Concept map as a teaching and learning tool for medical students. J Educ Health Promot. 2021;10:35.
  18. Choudhari SG, Gaidhane AM, Desai P, Srivastava T, Mishra V, Zahiruddin SQ. Applying visual mapping techniques to promote learning in community-based medical education activities. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21(1):210.
  19. Nath S, Bhattacharyya S, Preetinanda P. Perception of Students and Faculties towards Implementation of Concept Mapping in Pharmacology: A Cross-sectional Interventional Study. J Clin of Diagn Res. 2021;15(4):FC08-FC13.
24 . West DC, Pomeroy JR, Park JK, Gerstenberger EA, Sandoval J. Critical Thinking in Graduate Medical Education: A Role for Concept Mapping Assessment? JAMA. 2000;284(9):1105–10.

  1. Cutrer WB, Castro D, Roy KM, Turner TL. Use of an expert concept map as an advance organizer to improve understanding of respiratory failure. Med Teach. 2011;33(12):1018-26.
  2. Giavarina D. Understanding Bland Altman analysis. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2015;25(2):141-51.
  3. Azzopardi M, Azzopardi C. Relationship between Item Difficulty Level and Item Discrimination in Biology Final Examinations. Education and New Developments 2019 [Internet]. 2019 [Cited 13 June 2019]. Available from: http://end-educationconference.org/2019/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/2019v2end001.pdf.
  4. Machado CT, Carvalho AA. Concept Mapping: Benefits and Challenges in Higher Education. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education. 2020;68(1):38-53.
  5. Ortega-Tudela JM, Lechuga MT, Gómez-Ariza CJ. A specific benefit of retrieval-based concept mapping to enhance learning from texts. Instr Sci. 2019;47:239–55.
  6. Chevron MP. A metacognitive tool: Theoretical and operational analysis of skills exercised in structured concept maps. Perspectives in Science. 2014;2(1-4):46-54.
  7. Ho VW, Harris PG, Kumar RK, Velan GM. Knowledge maps: a tool for online assessment with automated feedback. Med Educ Online. 2018;23(1):1457394.
  8. The Pros and Cons of Multiple-Choice Questions used a Means for Evaluating the Child’s Knowledge - The Knowledge Hub [Internet]. The Knowledge Hub. 2021 [cited 2022 Aug 6]. Available from: https://knowledge-hub.com/2021/10/12/the-pros-and-cons-of-multiple-choice-questions-used-a-means-for-evaluating-the-childs-knowledge/.
  9. Fonseca M, Oliveira B, Carreiro-Martins P, Neuparth N, Rendas A. Revisiting the role of concept mapping in teaching and learning pathophysiology for medical students. Adv Physiol Educ. 2020;44(3):475-81.
  10. Gamboa T, Rosado-Pinto P, Rendas A. Use of concept maps as an assessment tool in a pathophysiology course. In: Concept Maps: Theory, Methodology, and Technology. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Concept Mapping. Valletta, Malta. 2012;3:218–21.
  11. Ekin B, Uluçınar Sağır Ş, Saltan F. The Comparison on Evaluation of Concept Map and Structured Grid with Multiple-Choice Test. Participatory Educational Research. 2016;3(5):100–11.
  12. Loizou S, Nicolaou N, Pincus BA, Papageorgiou A, McCrorie P. Concept maps as a novel assessment tool in medical education [version 1]. MedEdPublish. 2022;12:21.
  13. Addae JI, Wilson JI, Carrington C. Students' perception of a modified form of PBL using concept mapping. Med Teach. 2012;34(11):e756-62.
  14. Torre DM, Daley B, Stark-Schweitzer T, Siddartha S, Petkova J, Ziebert M. A qualitative evaluation of medical student learning with concept maps. Med Teach. 2007;29(9):949-55.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,173
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 735


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب