LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,230
تعداد مقالات11,205
تعداد مشاهده مقاله78,023,325
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله103,587,852
JACOBS, CHRIS, RIGBY, JACOB M.. (1401). Developing measures of immersion and motivation for learning technologies in healthcare simulation: a pilot study. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 10(3), 163-171. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2022.95226.1632
CHRIS JACOBS; JACOB M. RIGBY. "Developing measures of immersion and motivation for learning technologies in healthcare simulation: a pilot study". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 10, 3, 1401, 163-171. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2022.95226.1632
JACOBS, CHRIS, RIGBY, JACOB M.. (1401). 'Developing measures of immersion and motivation for learning technologies in healthcare simulation: a pilot study', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 10(3), pp. 163-171. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2022.95226.1632
JACOBS, CHRIS, RIGBY, JACOB M.. Developing measures of immersion and motivation for learning technologies in healthcare simulation: a pilot study. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1401; 10(3): 163-171. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2022.95226.1632

Developing measures of immersion and motivation for learning technologies in healthcare simulation: a pilot study

Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism
دوره 10، شماره 3، مهر 2022، صفحه 163-171    اصل مقاله (838.26 K)
نوع مقاله: Original Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/jamp.2022.95226.1632
نویسندگان
CHRIS JACOBS* 1، 2؛ JACOB M. RIGBY3
1Swindon Academy, Great Western Hospital, Swindon, UK
2University of Bath, Swindon, UK
3School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, University Road, Bristol, BS8 1SS, UK
چکیده
Introduction: Medical education has benefitted from the introduction of new technology within recent years. Immersive
devices, such as, 360-degree films and virtual reality have become new ways of simulating clinical experiences. The aim of the study was to validate and test reliability of a new measure of engagement.
Methods: A between-participants design of 2 groups viewing a clinical consultation on a 360-degree headset or 2D monitor was conducted following computer random allocation of 40 healthcare professionals recruited from scheduled teaching. Twenty-three were assigned to 360-degree and 17 to 2D Medias. Adapted Immersion Experience Questionnaire (AIEQ) and Abridged Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (AIMI) were modified to match factors relating to clinical encounters. AIEQ and AIMI were utilised as the data collection tool by each group following video viewing. Spearman’s rank correlation was used to assess relationship between immersion and motivation. Comparisons between 360-degree and 2D media responses were made using Wilcoxon’s signed ranks test. Internal reliability coefficients of adapted measures were calculated with Cronbach alpha scores.
Results: Total immersion scores were statistically higher in those experiencing 360 (P<0.05), with a median difference of 14.50 (95% CI 6.50-22.00). A positive correlation existed between the total AIEQ and total score of the AIMI in both groups (rs=0.88, n=17, P<0.001). Internal consistency and reliability was demonstrated with a high Cronbach alpha score for the AIEQ (α=0.91). AIMI subscale alpha value was also high at (α=0.95) which shows the measures to be of high internal reliability.
Conclusions: Adaptation and validation of existing measures for use in healthcare education can be used to quantify levels of immersion and motivation. Standardising measures for use in evaluating new Technology Enhanced Learning is a step to aid understanding on how we develop these tools in medical education and how we might learn from immersive technology.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Patient simulation؛ Immersion؛ Virtual reality؛ Educational assessment
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  1. Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs. London: Prentice-Hall; 1984.
  2. Forrest K, McKimm J. Healthcare simulation at a glance. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley &amp; Sons; 2019.
  3. Moore JL, Dickson-Deane C, Galyen K. E-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same? The Internet and Higher Education. 2011; 14(2):129-35.
  4. Swanwick T, Forrest K, O'Brien BC. Understanding medical education [electronic resource]: evidence, theory, and practice [3rd]. Hoboken. NJ: WILEY Blackwell; 2019.
  5. Kumar Basak S, Wotto M, Bélanger P. E-learning, M-learning and D-learning: Conceptual definition and comparative analysis. E-Learning and Digital Media. 2018; 15(4):191-216.
  6. Wallace S, Clark M, White J. ‘It&#039;s on my iPhone’: attitudes to the use of mobile computing devices in medical education, a mixed-methods study. BMJ Open. 2012; 2(4):e001099.
  7. Topol E. Preparing the healthcare workforce to deliver the digital future. Final Report February 2019 - A Call For Evidence. England: Health Education England; 2019.
  8. Kapralos B, Uribe-Quevedo A, Dubrowski A. Immersive Technologies for Medical Education; Encyclopedia of Computer Graphics and Games. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017.
  9. Jennett C, Cox AL, Cairns P, Dhoparee S, Epps A, Tijs T, et al. Measuring and defining the experience of immersion in games. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 2008; 66(9):641-61.
  10. Patel D, Hawkins J, Chehab LZ, Martin-Tuite P, Feler J, Tan A, et al. Developing Virtual Reality Trauma Training Experiences Using 360-Degree Video: Tutorial. J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22(12):e22420.
  11. Roussou M, Oliver M, Slater M. The virtual playground: an educational virtual reality environment for evaluating interactivity and conceptual learning. Virtual Reality. 2006; 10(3):227-40.
  12. Sandars J. It appeared to be a good idea at the time but … A few steps closer to understanding how technology can enhance teaching and learning in medical education. Med Teach. 2011; 33(4):265-7.
  13. Patel DAO, Hawkins JAOX, Chehab LAO, Martin-Tuite PO, Feler JAO, Tan AAO, et al. Developing Virtual Reality Trauma Training Experiences Using 360-Degree Video: Tutorial. J Med Internet Res. 2020; 16:22.
  14. Zulkiewicz B, Boudewyns V, Gupta C. Using 360-degree video as a research stimulus in digital health studies: lessons learned. JMIR Serious Games. 2020; 8(1):e15422.
  15. Pieterse AD, Huurman VAL, Hierck BP, Reinders MEJ. Introducing the innovative technique of 360° virtual reality in kidney transplant education. Transpl Immunol. 2018; 49:5-6.
  16. Dyer E, Swartzlander BJ, Gugliucci MR. Using virtual reality in medical education to teach empathy. JMLA. 2018; 106(4):498-500.
  17. McGrath JL, Taekman JM, Dev P, Danforth DR, Mohan D, Kman N, et al. Using Virtual Reality Simulation Environments to Assess Competence for Emergency Medicine Learners. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2018; 25(2):186-95.
  18. Knowles MS. The modern practice of adult education; andragogy versus pedagogy, by Malcolm S. New York: Knowles, Association Press; 1970.
  19. Mann KV. Theoretical perspectives in medical education: past experience and future possibilities. Med Educ. 2011; 45(1):60-8.
  20. Cassidy S. Learning Styles: An overview of theories, models, and measures. Educational Psychology. 2004; 24(4):419-44.
  21. Artino AR, Konopasky A. The Practical Value of Educational Theory for Learning and Teaching in Graduate Medical Education. J Grad Med Educ. 2018; 10(6):609-13.
  22. Schifferdecker KE, Berman NB, Fall LH, Fischer MR. Adoption of computer-assisted learning in medical education: the educators&#039; perspective. Med Educ. 2012; 46(11):1063-73.
  23. Sweetser P, Wyeth P. GameFlow: A Model for Evaluating Player Enjoyment in Games. Computers in Entertainment. 2005; 3:3.
  24. Busselle R, Bilandzic H. Measuring Narrative Engagement. Media Psychology. 2009; 12(4):321-47.
  25. Calvillo Gamez E, Cox A. Chapter 4, Assessing the Core Elements of the Gaming Experience. London: Springer-Verlag London Limited; 2010.
  26. Ryan RM. Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1982; 43(3):450-61.
  27. Ryan RM, Mims V, Koestner R. Relation of reward contingency and interpersonal context to intrinsic motivation: A review and test using cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1983; 45(4):736-50.
  28. McAuley E, Duncan T, Tammen VV. Psychometric properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a competitive sport setting: a confirmatory factor analysis. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1989; 60(1):48-58.
  29. Plant RW, Ryan RM. Intrinsic motivation and the effects of self-consciousness, self-awareness, and ego-involvement: An investigation of internally controlling styles. Journal of Personality. 1985; 53(3):435-49.
  30. Rigby JM, Brumby DP, Gould SJJ, Cox AL.Paper presented at: ; 2019.
  31. Sattar MU, Palaniappan S, Lokman A, Hassan A, Shah N, Riaz Z. Effects of Virtual Reality training on medical students&#039; learning motivation and competency. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences. 2019; 35(3):852-7.
  32. Mason T. G627(P) Is virtual resus training the future? Can 360 degree ‘immersive video’ engage paediatric trainees safely in life support training? – A project as part of the south west return to paediatric training course (SWRPT). Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2019; 104(Suppl 2):A254.
  33. Taubert M, Webber L, Hamilton T, Carr M, Harvey M. Virtual reality videos used in undergraduate palliative and oncology medical teaching: results of a pilot study. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care. 2019; 9(3):281-5.
  34. Anbro SJ, Szarko AJ, Houmanfar RA, Maraccini AM, Crosswell LH, Harris FC, et al. Using Virtual Simulations to Assess Situational Awareness and Communication in Medical and Nursing Education: A Technical Feasibility Study. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management. 2020; 40(1-2):129-39.
  35. Schulz KF, Grimes DA. Unequal group sizes in randomised trials: guarding against guessing. Lancet. 2002; 359(9310):966-70.
  36. Chirico A, Cipresso P, Yaden DB, Biassoni F, Riva G, Gaggioli A. Effectiveness of Immersive Videos in Inducing Awe: An Experimental Study. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):1218.
  37. Tang KS, Cheng DL, Mi E, Greenberg PB. Augmented reality in medical education: a systematic review. Canadian medical education journal. 2020; 11(1):e81-e96.
  38. Learning from Computer Games: A Research Review. Serious Games: The Challenge; 2012. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2012.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 3,101
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,647


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب