پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 20 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,232 |
| تعداد مقالات | 11,230 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 78,254,557 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 104,622,690 |
Immunologic Factors in Acute Rheumatic Fever Compared to Rheumatic Heart Disease | ||
| Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences | ||
| مقاله 5، دوره 26، 3-4، اسفند 2001، صفحه 116-119 اصل مقاله (820.22 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article(s) | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| M.R. Sabri* ؛ D. Zohouri؛ A. Ghaderi؛ A. Alavian Ghavanini؛ J. Kohan Teb؛ M. Borzouee | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Background/Objective: To clarify the state of different immunologic factors in patients with acute rheumatic fever (ARF) and rheumatic heart disease (RHD) compared to healthy individuals.Patients and Methods: Patients with ARF (#21), patients with RHD six months after the onset of ARF (#19), and healthy children from the same age group with normal physical examination and no history of pharyngitis during the previous month as the control group (#20) were studied. All patients were evaluated and followed for the presence and the severity of carditis, heart failure, and valvular involvement with echocardiography. Antistreptolysin-O (ASO) titer, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), serum complements C3 and C4, immunoglobins IgA, IgM, and IgG, IgM Rheumatoid Factor (RF), IgM and IgG anti-cardiolipin antibody (ACLA), and IgM and IgG anti-M group A streptococcal protein (AMP) were compared.Results: There was a significant difference for IgG and IgM ACLA between groups (p=0.005 and p=0.0001, respectively). These results were shown to reflect the difference between patients with ARF and the other two groups. There was a significant difference for IgG AMP between ARF and RHD groups (p=0.05). There was a significant difference for IgM RF between ARF and RHD groups (p=0.05). There was a significant difference for serum IgG between groups (p=0.0005). This was shown to reflect a significant difference between patients with ARF and the two other groups. Serum IgG was significantly lower in patients with, than in patients without, aortic valve involvement (p=0.039). Similarly, Serum IgG was significantly lower in patients with pericardial effusion (p=0.013).Conclusion: There are significant differences for IgG and IgM ACLA and IgG AMP and serum IgG levels and IgM RF between ARF patients and the other two groups. Whether IgG has a “protective effect” in patients with ARF preventing them from developing pericardial effusion, aortic valve involvement, or other complications is a notable question that must be answered. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 3,526 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,734 |
||