| تعداد نشریات | 20 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,230 |
| تعداد مقالات | 11,205 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 78,022,569 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 103,586,627 |
Treatment of Open Tibial Fractures: Convert-ing or Continuing External Fixation? | ||
| Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences | ||
| مقاله 2، دوره 33، شماره 1، خرداد 2008، صفحه 7-11 اصل مقاله (134.95 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article(s) | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Saaid Tabatabai* ؛ E. Hosseini | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Background: The treatment of open tibial fractures is still an orthopaedic challenge and full of complications. In many cases the use of external fixator that has been known as a non-union machine is obligatory with a high incidence of pin track infection and other complications. The aim of this study was to compare the use of external fixation as a definite method for treatment of open tibial fractures with its subsequent conversion to internal fixation or casting. Methods: Sixty-seven young patients with type III open tibial fractures (Gustilo-Anderson classification) were treated with half pin external fixation. Twenty of them were converted into internal fixation after a period of 6-8 weeks. For another twenty-five, external fixator was removed and treatment continued with casting for a period lasting from 16 to 20 weeks. And for twenty two patients the fixator continued until complete union. The patients followed up for 10-16 months and were evaluated in terms of union time, union rate, infection, range of motion, malunion, non-union, nerve injury, and reduction. Results: There was a meaningful difference only in the union time and superficial infection between the first group and the other two groups. Conclusion: The conversion of external to internal fixation can be considered as a safe, effective, less complicated, and more acceptable method for the treatment of open tibial fractures. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| External fixation؛ conversion؛ union | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 3,313 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,458 |
||